KAILASA Library/Hindu Holocaust/HC to quash FIRs if CID fails to chargesheet Nithya in 4 weeksSign in
Hindu Holocaust

HC to quash FIRs if CID fails to chargesheet Nithya in 4 weeks

This text was machine-transcribed from the printed book and may contain errors. Select the words and choose “Report a mistake”.

Odeal D'Souza BANGALORE

The Karnataka high court has
indicated that it would quash
the two First Information Re-
ports (FIRs) filed against god-
man Swami Paramahamsa
Nithyananda in Bidadi police
station if the Criminal Inves-
tigation Department (CID)
failed to chargesheet him with-
in four weeks.
The indication came after
Justice Arali Nagaraj on Fri-
day issued an ultimatum to the
CID to either file the
chargesheet or a final report in
the matter within four weeks.
The judge was hearing the
petition filed by Nithyananda
seeking the quashing of the two
FIRs, including one on rape.

The matter has been posted to
August 20 for final hearing.
Investigating officer KN Yo-
gappa submitted that he was
yet to chargesheet the godman
as he could not collect evidence
for various offences registered
against the swami.
The government counsel
further submitted to the court
that they needed some time to
record statements of Nithya
Vimalananda and Nithya Gopi-
ka, both of whom were resid-
ing abroad, to ascertain if the
godman had committed any of-
fence under Section 377 of IPC
on unnatural sex. One of the
two was likely to arrive in In-
dia soon, the court was in-
formed.
Yogappa submitted that no

Investigating officer KN
Yogappa submitted
that he was still to
collect evidence for
chargesheet

statement could be recorded
for offences under Section 376
of IPC on rape as Tamil actor
Ranjitha, whose alleged sleaze
acts with self-styled godman
Nithyananda triggered off a
public outcry, has denied any
sexual relations with him and
termed the video footage aired
by television channels as
"morphed".
In a statement to the CID,
Ranjitha rejected charges of

sexual harassment by
Nithyananda and said the
woman shown on the video
was not her. She denied any
sexual relations with the swa-
mi and said that she had "only
visited Nithyananda's room
once or twice".
Yogappa told the court that
he had sought permission
from the Centre to rush two of-
ficers abroad in connection
with the probe, and this would
require time.
The judge said though
enough evidence had been col-
lected for offences under Sec-
tions 295A and 506 IPC, mate-
rial was yet to be collected un-
der the other two sections
slapped against the godman.
[email protected]

Freedom

Thanks to tardy investigation, Swami Nithyananda might find himself free of some charges

ALSO EDUCATE ALL VISITORS TO THE BEACH HERE, AS A FEW SEMINERS WILL BE PUT UNDER OBSERVATION AND LATER RELEASED IN SEA

each is all set to host and study the Olive Ridley turtles

M Raghuram MARAWANTHE

The Olive Ridley turtles have
been arriving on the state's
coast for centuries! At Mara-
vanthe, on a stretch of beach
half-way between Mangalore
and Karwar, in Udupi district,
the turtles lay millions of eggs
during August-October each
vear

2,000 turtles to come

A rough estimate is that nearly 2,000 turtles arrive on the Maravanthe beach each year, between August and October, Each of the turtles lays 50-60 eggs. Maravanthe is the only beach on the country's Western coast that hosts the turtles. Nagapattinam in Tamil Nadu and Gopalpur beach in Orissa are centres where the turtles breed on the Eastern coast.

terest waned in 2009," said
Palaiah, deputy conservator of
forests, Kundapur.
"There is great interest in
these turtles, but little scope
for scientific knowledge about
them for the local people,
many of whom already have a
high degree of empathy with
these creatures."

in a depression inside the per-
gola; this depressed area is
lined with natural material
like sand and rounded stones,
to recreate the environment of
the sea.
When the Olive Ridley tur-
tles arrive at the beach, a few
specimens will be brought to

.

VIDEO TRANSCRIPT:

Here are the 1st visuals of the tainted Swami Nithyananda being released from the Bangalore jail. Swami Nithyananda was granted bail on Friday and was arrested on charges of rape and as well as molestation. Aslesha is with us on the phone lines.

Aslesha what are the conditions of the release and secondly was it that the Bangalore Police was not able to build, you know, a good enough strong case around him that he's finally managed to get bail?

Well, it's absolutely right. Just a couple of minutes ago, we had Swami Nithyananda being released from the Ramanagaram jail. That's where he was for the last 40 odd days.

Of course. During that period he was also in CID's custody. So a total of 50 days that Nithyananda had spent in custody. Of course. Yesterday, the Karnataka high court granted bail for the tainted god man. What the Karnataka high court did say was that the prosecution was not able to gather enough evidence against the god man and that is why they were granting the bail. Now of course, this bail was subject to a couple of conditions, one of which was a personal bond for 1 lakh rupees and 2 sureties.

Of course Swami Nithyananda also has to surrender his passport before the court and he does not have any permission to leave the country without the permission of the court and what is most significant is really that Swami Nithyananda has been for bidden from undertaking any sort of public sermons and public classes during this bail period and if he were to undertake any of these sermons then his bail stands cancelled is what the Karnataka high court has said. Now of course Swami Nithyananda is facing charges under several sections of the IPC. That is if I can just recap for you: 295-A of the IPC which suggests hurting religious sentiments. There is 506 for criminal intimidation, 420 for cheating, 376 for rape, 377 for unnatural offences and 120-B for conspiracy. So really, his bail plea having been granted on ground of insufficient evidence having been collected by the prosecution.

Below is the memo submitted by the CID to the Hon'ble High Court stating that after exhaustive interrogation, they have not been able to collect any evidence against Paramahamsa Nithyananda

memo

6889 C.V. Nagesh Asst

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.2328 OF 2010 C/W 2329/2010, 2344/2010

BETWEEN:

Nithyanandaswamy and another : PETITIONERS

AND

State of Karnataka Through Ramanagara Police : RESPONDENT

MEMO FOR STATUS REPORT

The crime was registered by Chennai Police and transferred to Bidadi Police in Crime Nos.141 and 142/2010 dated 18.03.2010 and the C.I.D. Police has investigated the matter. As on today, no witness come forward to lead evidence against Nithyananda and part of the investigation is completed and Nithyananda - A-1 does not require for further interrogation. The detailed status report is produced along with this memo.

PLACE: BANGALORE

DATED: 11.06.2010

( SATISH R.GIRIJI )
HIGH COURT GOVT.PLEADER
AND
ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT-STATE

SRG/mkr/110610/c-9

This certificate represents contains 5 pages and a court fee stamps of Rs......... is affixed

ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಸರ್ಕಾರ

Seal

ದೂರವಾಣಿ ಸಂ.080-22254789 22942211

ನಂ:ಸಿಆರ್‌ಬಿ/ಅಪ್‌/ಸಿ.ಐ.ಡಿ/2010.

ಪೊಲೀಸ್ ಮಹಾ ನಿರ್ದೇಶಕರುಗಳ ಕಛೇರಿ,
ಸಿ.ಐ.ಡಿ. ತನಿಖೆಗಳು, ವಿಶೇಷ ಘಟಕಗಳು
ಮತ್ತು ಆರ್ಥಿಕ ಅಪರಾಧಗಳು, ಕಾರ್ಲಟನ್ ಭವನ,
ಅರಮನೆ ರಸ್ತೆ, ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು.

ದಿ. 11.6.2010

ರ ವ ರಿ ಗೆ:-

ರಾಜ್ಯ ಸರ್ಕಾರಿ ಅಭಿಯೋಜಕರು,
ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಉಚ್ಚ ನ್ಯಾಯಾಲಯ,
ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು - 1.

ಮಾನ್ಯರೆ,

ವಿಷಯ :- ಬೆದರೆಹಳ್ಳಿ ಪೊಲೀಸ್ ಠಾಣೆ ಮೊ.ಸಂ. 141/10 ಮತ್ತು 142/10 ಪ್ರಕರಣಗಳನ್ನ ಸಿಒಡಿ ತನಿಖೆಗೆ ತನಿಖೆಗೆ ವಹಿಸುವ ಬಗ್ಗೆ.

ಮೇಲ್ಕಂಡ ವಿಷಯಕ್ಕೆ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ತಮ್ಮ ಗಮನಕ್ಕೆತರುವುದೇನೆಂದರೆ, ದಿ. 18.3.2010 ರಂದು ಬೆದರೆಹಳ್ಳಿ ಪೊಲೀಸ್ ಠಾಣೆಯಲ್ಲಿ ಪ್ರತ್ಯೇಕ ನಗರದ ಅಪರಾಧ ವಿಭಾಗದಿಂದ ಸ್ವೀಕರಿಸಿದ ಮೊ. ಸಂ. 295/2010 ಕಲಂ 295(ಎ), 420, 376, 377, 506(2) ಮತ್ತು 120(ಬಿ) ಭಾ.ದಂ.ಸಂ. ಪ್ರಕರಣದ ಜಂಟಿಯಾಗಿ ಬೆದರೆ ಹಳ್ಳಿ ಪೊಲೀಸ್ ಠಾಣೆ ಮೊ. ಸಂ. 141/2010 ಕಲಂ 295, 420, 376, 377, 506(1) ಮತ್ತು 120(ಬಿ) ಭಾ.ದಂ.ಸಂ.ದ ಪ್ರಕರಣ ದಾಖಲು ಮಾಡಲಾಗಿರುತ್ತದೆ. ಪ್ರಸ್ತುತ ಕಛೇರಿ ಆದೇಶ ಸಂ. ಇಸಿಆರ್/23/ಸಿ.ಆರ್.ಟಿವಿ/2010 ದಿ. 19.3.2010 ರಂದು ಸಿ.ಐ.ಡಿ. ವಿಭಾಗದಲ್ಲಿ ಪ್ರಕರಣದ ಮುಂದಿನ ತನಿಖೆಗಾಗಿ ಸ್ವೀಕರಿಸಲಾಗಿದೆ. ಸದರಿ ಕಾಯ್ದೆಗಳು ಅಪರಾಧಗಳ ಸ್ವಭಾವದ ನ್ಯಾಯಾಲಯ ಪರಿಧಿಗೆ ಒಳಪಟ್ಟಿರುವುದಿಲ್ಲ ಮತ್ತು ಎರಡೂ ಬೆದರೆ ಹಳ್ಳಿ ಠಾಣೆಯಲ್ಲಿ ಪ್ರತ್ಯೇಕ ಜಂಟಿ ತಕರಾರು ದಾಖಲಾಗಿದ್ದು, ನ್ಯಾಯಾಲಯದ ಅರ್ಜಿಗೆ ಆರೋಪಿತ ಪ್ರಸಾಧನ ಸಾಮಗ್ರಿಗಳ ಕಳ್ಳತನದ ಎಲ್ಲಾ ಕೃತ್ಯಗಳನ್ನು ಹಾಗೂ ಅದನ್ನು ಮಾರಾಟ ಮಾಡುವುದನ್ನು ಪತ್ನಿ ಪುಟ 23 ರೊಡನೆಯೂ ಕಾರ್ಡ್ ಫೋನ್ ಮತ್ತು 02 ಸೀರಿಯಲ್ ಸಂಖ್ಯೆಗಳಲ್ಲಿ ಸಿಮ್‌ಗಳ ಮೂಲಕ ಅನುಷ್ಟಾನಿಸಿದರು. ಹಾಗೂ ಜಂಟಿಯಾಗಿ ನಿರೂಪಿಸಿದ ಸ್ತ್ರೀಪಾತ್ರಧಾರಿಯ ಆಟದಂತೆ, ನಡೆದುಕೊಳ್ಳುವಂತೆ ಆಪ್ತರನ್ನು ಕೆರಳಿಸಿ ಪರಾಕಾಷ್ಠೆಗೆ ತಲುಪಿಸಲಾಯಿತು. ತರುವಾಯ ಧಾರ್ಮಿಕ ಧಾರ್ಮಿಕ ಪ್ರಸಾರಕರಿಗೆ ತೀವ್ರ ಅಪಮಾನವನ್ನು ತಂದೊಡ್ಡಲಾಯಿತು. ಅಲ್ಲದೆ ಉತ್ಪನ್ನಗಳ ಸರಣಿ ವಿತರಣೆಯಾಗಿದೆ,

ಡಿ. 21.4.2010ರಂದು ಆರೋಪಿಯು ಪ್ರತಿಯೊಂದು ಯೋಜನೆಯ ಡ್ರಾಯಿಂಗ್ ಸಾಮಗ್ರಿ ಸಂಗ್ರಹಿಸಿ ಅದನ್ನು ಬಿ.ಎ.ಡಿ. ಪ್ರೇಮಾನಂದ ಮೇಲಿಂದ ಉಪಸ್ಥಿತರಿದ್ದಂತಹ ಶ್ರೀ ಎಂ.ಎಸ್. ರಮೇಶ್. ಹಾಗೂ ಶ್ರೀ. ಬಿ.ಎ.ಮಾನೇಜಿರವರ, ರವರ ಆದೇಶ-1 ರನ್ವಯದ ಪ್ರಾಜೆಕ್ಟ್ ಮತ್ತು ಕಟ್ಟಡ ಸಾಮಗ್ರಿಗಳ ನೀಡಬೇಕೆಂಬುದಂ ರಸ್ತೆ ರಸ್ತೆಯನ್ನು ತಕ್ಷಣವೇ ಮಾತುಕತೆ ನಡೆಸಿರುವುದಾಗಿ 10 ಸೆಕೆಂಡುಗಳ ಕಾಲಾವಧಿ. 09 ಪುಟಗಳ ಪರ್ಯಾಯ ಕಂಟ್ರೋಲ್ ಬಿಲ್డిಂಗ್ -01 ಲೈನ್ ಸೈನ್ ಗಳನ್ನು ಸಹ ಮಾಡದಿರುವುದನ್ನು, ಆಸ್ತಿಗಳನ್ನು ಸಂಪೂರ್ಣ ಚಾಲ್ತಿ ನಷ್ಟದಲ್ಲಿ ಇಡಲಾಗಿತ್ತು. ಸಾಧನಗಳನ್ನು ತಡೆಹಿಡಿಯಲಾಗಿತ್ತು. ತನ್ಮೂಲಕ ಉತ್ಪನ್ನಗಳ ಸರಣಿ ಸಾಲದ ಸರಬರಾಜು ಟ್ರ್ಯಾಕ್ಟರ್‌ಗಳನ್ನು ಮತ್ತು ಜಮೀನನ್ನು ಸಂಭಾವ್ಯ ಅಪರಾಧಿಗಳನ್ನು ಫೋರೆನ್ಸಿಕ್ ತಜ್ಞರನ್ನೊಳಗೊಂಡ ಸಂಬಂಧಿಸಿದಂತೆ, ಅಧಿಕಾರಿಗೆ/ಕುಟುಂಬ ಸದಸ್ಯರಿಗೆ ತಮ್ಮ ವಾಸ್ತವತೆಯನ್ನು ಸಾಬೀತು ಪಡಿಸುವಂತೆ ಕಾನೂನುಬದ್ಧವಾಗಿ ಅಭ್ಯರ್ಥಿಗಳನ್ನು ಸಾಬೀತು ಪಡಿಸಬೇಕಾಗಿದ್ದಲ್ಲಿ. ಇದು ಉನ್ನತ ಮಟ್ಟದ ಅನುಮಾನಗಳನ್ನು ಉತ್ಪಾದಿಸಿ ವಾರಾಂತ್ಯದಲ್ಲಿ ಕೊನೆಗೊಳ್ಳಬಹುದು.

ಡಿ. 24.4.2010ರಂದು ಯೋಜನೆಯ ಅಧಿಕಾರಿಯೊಬ್ಬರು ಶ್ರೀ. ದೇವ್ರ ಅಭ್ಯರ್ಥಿಯಿಂದ ಲಾಯರ್, ಲಿಫ್ಟ್ ರವರನ್ನು ಬಿ.ಎ.ಡಿ. ನಿಯಮದಲ್ಲೂ ತಲುಪಿಸಬೇಕಾಗಬಹುದೆಂದು. ಯೋಜನೆಯ ಮೂಲವು ಸಂಪೂರ್ಣ ರದ್ದತಿಯ ಸಾಗಾಣಿಕೆಯ ಸಂಚಿಕೆಯ Non Disclosure Agreement (10 ಪುಟಗಳು) )ಎಂಬ ದಾಖಲೆಗಳನ್ನು ನೀಡಲಾಗುತ್ತದೆ. ಕೇವಲ ವೈಯಕ್ತಿಕ ಪರಿಶೀಲನೆಗಾಗಿ. ಅದರ ವಿವರಗಳನ್ನು ಚರ್ಚಿಸಿ 09 ರಲ್ಲಿ ಆರೋಪಿತ ಪ್ರಸಾಧನ ಸಾಮಗ್ರಿಗಳ ಸಹಿ ಅಥವಾ ಸರಬರಾಜು ಸೇವೆಯೊಂದಿಗೆ ಬೈಂಡಿಂಗ್ ಮತ್ತು ಇತರೆ ವಿವರಗಳಿಗೆ ಅಲ್ಲಿ ಆರೋಪಿತರಿಂದ (ಇತ್ಯಾದಿಗಳಿಂದ) ತೂಕಮಾಡಲ್ಪಟ್ಟ ಅಪರಾಧದ ಉತ್ಪನ್ನಗಳಲ್ಲಿದ್ದ ಅಪಾಯಗಳನ್ನು ಪರಿಣಾಮಕಾರಿಯಾಗಬಹುದೆಂದು ಬೆಂಬಲಿಸುವ ಶಂಕಿಸಲಾಗಿರುವುದಾಗಿ ಸೂಚಿಸಿ ಅದಕ್ಕಾಗಿ, ನೆರೆ

stamp

ಖಾತೆಯಲ್ಲಿ ನಮೂದಿಸಿರುವ ಫೋಟೋದಲ್ಲಿ ಇರಬೇಕಾದ ವ್ಯಕ್ತಿಯಿಂದ ಪ್ರತಿಯಾಗಿ ಬೇರೊಂದು ಖಾತೆದಾರರ ಚುನಾವಣಾ ಗುರುತಿನ ಚೀಟಿಯ ವಿವರಗಳನ್ನು ಪಡೆದು ಸಹಿ ಮರುಪಡಿಸಿ ಅವರ ಪ್ರತಿಯಾಗಿ ಬೇರೆ ವ್ಯಕ್ತಿಯ ಖಾತೆಯನ್ನು ಸೃಷ್ಟಿಸಿಕೊಂಡು ಖಾತೆದಾರರ ಹೆಸರಿನ ಶೇಖರಣೆಯ ಸರಕುಗಳನ್ನು ಮಾರಾಟ ಮಾಡಿ ಸಹಿ ಮರುಪಡಿಸಿ ಗೂಡಂಗಡಿ ಸಂಘದ ಹುದ್ದೆಯನ್ನು ಪಡೆದು ಕಾಯ್ದೆಯನ್ವಯ ಮರುಪಾವತಿ ಮಾಡದೇಇರುವ ಸದಸ್ಯರ ವಿವರಗಳನ್ನು ಮತ್ತು ಪ್ರತಿಯೊಬ್ಬ ಸದಸ್ಯರ ಮರುಪಾವತಿಯನ್ನೊಳಗೊಂಡ ಪ್ರತಿಯೊಂದು ದಾಖಲೆಯ ವಿಲೇವಾರಿ ಮಾಡಿರುವುದಾಗಿ ಬೆಂಬಲಿಸುತ್ತಿದ್ದರೆ ವರ್ತಕರ ಮಾಹಿತಿಯ ಮೌಲ್ಯಮಾಪನ ಸಂಸ್ಥೆಯಿಂದ ಬಂದಿರುವ ವಿವರದ ಸಿ.ಡಿ.ಯಲ್ಲಿನ 02 ಮಾಹಿತಿಯ ಆಧಾರದ ಮೇರೆಗೆ, ಆರೋಪಿಯುಸಹಿ ಸಾಬೀತುಪಡಿಸುವ ರೀತಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ಮಾಡಿಕೊಂಡಿರುವ ಪ್ರತಿಯೊಂದು ಪ್ರಮಾಣಪತ್ರಗಳನ್ನು, ಸಮಿತಿಯಿಂದ ನೀಡುವ ತಪ್ಪಿನ ಸಾಕ್ಷಿಪುರಾವೆಗಳನ್ನು ಪರಿಶೀಲಿಸಲಾಗಿ, ಪಟ್ಟಿಮಾಡಿದ ಮರುಪಾವತಿಯ ಕಾರ್ಖಾನೆಗಳನ್ನು ಪರೀಕ್ಷಿಸಿ, ಲಭ್ಯವಿರುವ ಉಳಿದ ದಿನಗಳಂದು, ಬ್ಯಾಂಕಿನಲ್ಲಿ ಯಾವುದೇ ಬಡ್ಡಿಪಾವತಿಯಾಗದಿರುವುದರಿಂದ ಮತ್ತು ಮರುಪಾವತಿಯ ಕಾರ್ಖಾನೆಯನ್ನು 58 ಪತ್ರಗಳಲ್ಲಿ ಕೈಬಿಡಬೇಕೆಂದು (Delete) ಅಲ್ಲಿ ತಿಳಿಸಿದ್ದು, ಪ್ರತ್ಯೇಕವಾಗಿ ಪುನಃ ಪಡೆದುಕೊಳ್ಳುವಂತೆ (Retrieve) ತಿಳಿಸಲಾಗಿದ್ದು, ಈ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಶಂಕೆ ವ್ಯಕ್ತಪಡಿಸಿದ್ದು, ಸಾಬೀತುಪಡಿಸುವಂತೆ ನೀಡಿರುವ ವರದಿಯಂತೆಗಾಗಿದೆ

ಸದರಿಯವರ ಜಂಟಿಖಾತೆ ಪ್ರಸ್ತಾಪಿಸಿರುವ ಪ್ರತಿಯೊಂದು ದಾಖಲೆಯ ಮಾಹಿತಿಗಾಗಿ ಬಿಡುಗಡೆ ವಿವರಗಳನ್ನು ಕೊಟ್ಟಿರುತ್ತಾರೆಯೆಂದು ಮಾಹಿತಿ ನೀಡಿದ ಅಧಿಕಾರಿಗಳಿಗೆ ನಿಯಮಾವಳಿಯಂತೆ ಅವರ ಪ್ರತಿಯೊಂದು ದಾಖಲೆಯನ್ನು ತಿಳಿಸಿರುತ್ತಾರೆ. ಆದರೆ ಪ್ರತಿಯೊಂದರೊಂದಿಗೂ ರೂಪಿಸಲಾಗಿರುವ ಪ್ರತಿಯೊಂದು ಸಂಚಾರಕ್ಕೆ ಸಂಬಂಧಿಸಿದೆ

ಸದರಿಯವರ ಮುಕ್ತಾಯಗೊಂಡ ಪ್ರತಿಯೊಂದು ಖಾತೆಗಳ ವಿವರಗಳನ್ನು ನೋಂದಾಯಿಸಿದ ಬಿಡುಗಡೆ ವಿವರ ಕೊಟ್ಟಿರುತ್ತಾರೆಯೆಂದು' ಕಾರ್ಯದರ್ಶಿ ಸದಸ್ಯರುಗಳ ಸಹಕಾರ ಸಂಸ್ಥೆಯು ವಿವರ ಪ್ರತಿಯೊಂದಿಗೆ ಆಹಾರದ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ವಿವರಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ. ತರುವಾಯ ವಿವರಗಳ ಮಾಹಿತಿಗಳನ್ನು ಖಾತರಿಪಡಿಸಿಕೊಳ್ಳಬೇಕಾಗಿದೆ.

ಸರ್ಕಾರದಿಂದ ಆಜ್ಞೆಯನ್ನು 2009 ರ ಡಿಸೆಂಬರ್ 30 ರಲ್ಲೇ ರದ್ದು ಪಡಿಸಿದ್ದು, ನಂತರ ಯಾವುದೇ 18 ಸರಕಾರಿ ಪೂರಕವಾಗಿ ನಮೂದಿಸಿದ ಪ್ರತಿಯೊಂದು ಉಲ್ಲೇಖಗಳನ್ನು ಪೂರ್ಣಗೊಳಿಸಿದ ಸಹಿ ಉದ್ಯೋಗಿಗೆ ಪ್ರತಿಯೊಂದನ್ನು ಬಡ್ಡಿ ಪಾವತಿಯನ್ನು ಖಾತರಿಪಡಿಸಿಕೊಳ್ಳಬೇಕಾಗಿದೆ. ಅದನ್ನು ಜಾರಿ ಮಾಡದಿರುವ

Seal
document

Here is the translation of the same:

No.11/Crimes/SE/CID/2010 Office of the Director General of Police

CID Office, Special Units & Economic Offences

Carlton Bhavan, Palace Road, Bengaluru

Dt. 11-6-2010

To,

State Government Prsecutor

Karnataka High Court

Bengaluru-1

Sir,

Sub: Regarding Submission of present inspection report in Ramanagar Police Station Case

No.141/10 and 142/10

What to be reported about the above subject is that on 18-3-2010 in Bidadi Police Station case

based on 112/2010 Sec 295(A), 420, 376,377, 506(2) and 120(B) IPC was received from

Chennai City Crimes Division and registered the case as Bidadi PS Case no.141/2010 sec

295, 420, 376,377,506(1) and 120(B) IPC. THE CID division has received Head Office order

no. Crimes/23/CR RA No./2010 dt/19-3-2010 for further investigation of the case. At the time

of the investigation, request has been submitted at the time of investigation to the Chief

Judicial Magistrate of Ramanagar and twice search warrants had been obtained, and all the

buildings and the living room of the accused Paramahamsa Nithyananda in Nithyananda

Dhyanapeeta, Kallugopahalli in Bidadi were searched and seized through inquest 23 computer

harddisks and 2 registration books, and entered in the List of Articles and teh court order has

been obtained. They have been sent to the Central Forensic Laboratory, Department of

Disputed Documents, Hyderabad for expert opinion. The opinion of experts is yet to come.

On 21-4-2-1-, in Malvich of Vikrampur City of Solan Dt. In Himachal Pradesh, Sri.M.S.Hussein Sub-Inspector of CID Department and also Sri.C.B.Hosakeri, arrested the accused-1 Nithyananda Swami and Nithya Bhaktananda, alias Gopal Sheelum Reddy and at the time 10 mobile phones, 9 sim cards, 3 laptops and 1 pen drive have also been seized and had been sent to Central Forensic Laboratory, Hyderabad, and the report from the experts has arrived. In traditional programmes of Brahmacharya and Vanaprastha, the devotees /volunteers are required to give their consent and acceptance to stimulating activities relating to sexual activities and participate. This has been highly controversial and can be considered as evidence for the crime.

On 24-4-2010, the complainant of the case, Sri Nithya Dharmananda, alias Lenin, had been subjected to interrogation at the CID office. The Non-Disclosure Agreement (of 10 pages) which was produced by Lenin at the time of interrogation has been seized and entered in the list of articles. In the 9th page of the said document, it is observed and agreement has been made wherein without the prior consent from the accused (Nithyananda), the activities about the sexual and other activities of the accused Paramahamsa Nithyananda Swami with the volunteers of the Ashram should not be revealed. To the said document, on behalf of Nithyananda Dhyanapeetam Trust, the trustee Smt.Ma Sadananda alias Jamuna wife of Sadananda had signed , it is revealed. An original CD videographed by the said complainant and 2 vie chips pertaining to the accused Paramahamsa Nithyananda and one of the main witness of the case Smt.Ranjitha Menon behaving indecently have been sent to the Forensic Laboratory in New Delhi and the experts opinion has been obtained. The experts have examined the two memory cards and informed that they are genuine CDs and no tampering what so ever had been made and in the two memory cards 58 files had been deleted. They have been retrieved again and the complainant has to be subjected to interrogation and obtain

the information.

The main witness of the case Mrs.Ranjitha Menon has told through her lawyers that she would

come back to the country and appear for enquiry. Her lawyers have been contacted through

telephone.

It is known through some close contacts of another witness of the case Mrs.Ma Nithyananda

Gopika that she also will be coming to Karnataka shortly. She would be interrogated when the

information is known.

18 year old boy Nithya Vairagyananda is yet to be interrogated about his attempt to suicide by

consuming poison since he could not tolerate the torture given by Nithyananda Swami. His

mother Nithya Nirantara is in Malaysia and she has been contacted through some well

wishers. It is known that she also would be coming to Tamilnadu shortly she will be enquired.

Some anonymous threatening e-mails have been sent to the complainant of the case Sri

Nithya Dharmananda. About this information is being collected through cyber police station.

Because of all these reasons, investigations about the case is under progress. Even though

statements have been collected from 48 witnesses available so far no useful witness is

available against the accused. Since main witness are in foreign countries, in order to

interrogate them still more time is required.

List of fake cases filed against His Divine Holiness in the US

Douglas MacKallor, narcissist and cyberbully, was the the first conspirator against His Divine

Holiness Paramahamsa Nithyananda. Between 2009 and 2012, he filed numerous false

complaints with the FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation), the ICE (Immigration and Customs

Enforcement), and various other U.S. state and federal bodies. His complaints against

Paramahamsa Nithyananda ranged from money extortion to sexual abuse, and he helped a fake female victim file false complaints. This article presents a detailed timeline of his atrocities, despite repeated warnings from U.S. national agencies not to submit such unsubstantiated and vindictive claims.

In one of the most maliciously orchestrated conspiracies against Hindu Gurus, Douglas MacKallor was one of the chief instigators in the group that came together in the persecution of His Divine Holiness Paramahamsa Nithyananda. From threatening and blackmailing his own wife to convincing other women to play the role of a false rape victim, here is the exact chronicle of events as they happened. Please visit the link below to understand its grave impact.

Summary

August 2009 to February 2010

Douglas submitted fabricated false complaints to the FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) Field Office in Campbell, CA from August 2009 through February 2010.

August 2009 through February 2011

Douglas made numerous contacts via post and email with several U.S. Consulates including the ones in Vancouver, Canada, and India, and the U.S. Embassy in India. Douglas was trying to get the aadheenam (temple monastery complex) volunteers arrested during their visit to the U.S. Other than automated responses via email, Douglas was not able to execute any part of his vicious plans.

August 2009

Douglas made false reports through the U.S. ICE (United States Immigrations and Customs Enforcement) hotline, alleging illegal harboring of Canadian citizens at the Nithyananda Vedic Temple and Cultural Center in Montclair, CA.

25 March 2010

Douglas tried to file false criminal complaints of rape (with the help of a fake rape victim) to the California Attorney General. No action was taken.

30 August 2010

As Douglas compiled a lot of false material for his defamatory articles, he called the FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) Field Office located in Campbell, CA on Monday, August 30, 2010 around 10:30 am. The call was made to find out which Federal law agency he should submit his (forged) documents to. Douglas was trying to file a false case of money laundering. The FBI receptionist then connected his call to the FBI Duty Agent. The FBI Duty Agent told him that the previous documents he sent were received, and that he should not submit anything more to the FBI. The Duty Agent told him that he was “vindictive” regarding his divorce and that he would “never obtain an appointment with an FBI agent.” The conversation was then ended abruptly.

13 December 2010

On December 13, 2010, Douglas filed a complaint with the SEC (U.S. Security Exchange Commission), making some bogus claims with a bunch of documents fabricated by him and other conspirators. He found an entity named, “NITHYANANDA INVESTMENT FUND I LP” and alleged these were hedge funds and a part of a larger organized crime scheme that was used to help finance various crimes.

SEC form D/A Screenshot

US Government SEC website https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1428116/000142811609000002/xslFormDX01/primary_doc.xml reveals this entity has got nothing todo with His Divine Holiness Paramahamsa Nithyananda

Such a fund does exist, but the related people named as per government records is some third party. Basically, just because the name of the entity contained the word “Nithyananda”, Douglas

made a whole story out of it. Even independently no irregularities are known related to this entity. Some presstitutes in India claimed this to be their original “investigation” and published this article.

Nithyananda photo

Indian press taking credit of
Douglas' work of creating fake
documents

Dirty secret out

Self-styled godman Nithyananda's hedge fund that operated in the United States was named Nithyananda Investment Fund I, LP (limited partnership) according to investigations by Deccan Herald.

Another entity that managed the fund was called Nithyananda Capital Management LLC, or a limited liability company. The Fund was incorporated in November 2007 with its business address as 113 N, Econolockhatchee Trail, Orlando, Florida.

Deccan Herald is in possession of irrefutable documentary evidence that show Nithyananda promoted the Fund, though it was managed by his trusted aide Rajesh Krishnan and a Taiwanese national Shuping Lin. In the United States Securities Exchange Commission's (SEC) Form D, filled out as a notice for sale of securities, Nithyananda's name figures as one of three promoters of the Fund.

The same form describes the Fund as “a private investment company making investments in and trading listed securities, over the counter securities and public offerings”. Under Rule 506 of the US

The unsubstantiated complaint filed by Douglas was received by Mr. Bryan Burke, SEC Investor Assistance Specialist.He forwarded the report to an SEC agent. The report received a number: HO-00100476, Naturally no action was taken, and Mr. Bryan Burke (SEC Investor Assistance) stopped returning Douglas’ phone calls. Douglas then approached the SEC branch in San Francisco and spoke with Ms. Susan Lee, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy. Even here his attempts failed. He couldn’t secure an appointment with any SEC Agent in San Francisco, let alone convince them of his lies.

08 February 2011

Douglas tried to get the aadheenam (temple monastery complex) volunteers coming from India detained by the U.S. ICE Field Offices in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Seattle. The U.S. ICE did not detain any aadheenam (temple monastery complex) volunteer. The volunteers were able to enter the U.S. and continued to do their enriching and causing service.

June 2011

So far, Douglas had failed to convince SEC to take action against His Divine Holiness Paramahamsa Nithyananda based on his bogus stories and forged papers. He was also warned by the FBI to stop wasting officers’ time. Douglas now focused on filing his false papers with the IRS (Internal Revenue Service). He and other conspirators cooked up new stories and fake documents. Douglas suspected that he was able to make the IRS initiate some inquiries over Paramahamsa Nithyananda’s registered nonprofit organizations. Over time, the IRS notified him that it dropped its inquiry. To date, the IRS has not revoked from Publication 78 any of Paramahamsa Nithyananda’s twelve listed nonprofit entities.

22 July 2011

On Friday, July 22, 2011, around 3:45 p.m., Douglas secured an appointment with the FBI Field Office in Campbell, CA, and tried to present some more false documents. Douglas believed that the FBI would take his documents seriously and start its formal investigation. The FBI Duty Agent’s last request to him was not to file again, as not to make another agent spend valuable resources reviewing information that previously had been evaluated. Douglas felt that the FBI and Homeland Security / U.S. ICE shared the same databases, and interpreted the Duty Agent’s words as not to file with these other agencies either.

September 2011

Around the first week of September, 2011, Douglas assisted the false rape victim Aarthi Rao in filing a false complaint to to the FBI Field Office in Los Angeles and other agencies. However, in a different letter to Detective Michael Lencioni, dated Oct 08, 2012 she said she had not filed a complaint alleging sexual abuse by Paramahamsa Nithyananda; she only provided documents to explain why she felt her life was under threat!

September 2011

Around the first week of September 2011, and in early November 2011, Douglas assisted the false rape victim Aarthi Rao, in filing fake criminal charges of rape and death threats to the U.S. ICE Field Office in Los Angeles. He was not successful.

November 2011

In early November, 2011, Douglas helped the false female rape victim Aarthi Rao file a criminal complaint to the FBI Field Office in Los Angeles, CA and other agencies. The complaint alleged that she received death threats from Paramahamsa Nithyananda, his organizations, and top officers. There was no follow-up or action taken by the FBI.

Douglas filed every possible fake complaint he could create to the U.S. ICE Field Offices of Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, and Detroit, California Attorney General. No action was taken.

May 2012

In the last week of May 2012, Douglas attempted the same false complaint with Mr. James L. Renshaw, Chief Investigator of the Ohio Attorney General, and failed. Douglas submitted the same complaint and forged documents to Mr. Eric Holder, Attorney General of the U.S. Department of Justice. Although Douglas knew the U.S. Department of Justice does not conduct direct investigations against alleged crimes, he thought it might have some influence over the reporting agencies such as the FBI and U.S. ICE. In short, he was hoping to instigate investigations based on his fake documents. With this in mind, he requested the Attorney General to review the documents and then submit them to the appropriate contacts within the agencies to initiate an investigation. As expected, he failed to get any of these agencies to act.

04 June 2012

Douglas even sent a letter to a local senator (San Jose, USA) where he presented the timeline of the false complaints he attempted with different federal, state, and local agencies to defame Paramahamsa Nithyananda. Douglas tried to manipulate and persuade the senator to ask the federal, state, or local government agencies to take action against Paramahamsa Nithyananda as per his desire.

21 June 2012

After all the fraudulent attempts to somehow file a false case against His Divine Holiness Paramahamsa Nithyananda, with any of the bodies such as the FBI, California police, Michigan

Police , etc, an inquiry with the police revealed that the police did not even find a cause to investigate the case. Below is an email proof of the same.

Email from Detective Michael Lencioni regarding investigation status