Being brutal is a failing strategy, especially in the modern information age🔗

In Modern day era, more than murder which causes repercussions, it is character assassination, the murder of identity, which really kills the person

Being brutal in modern information age is a failing strategy. In the modern times, if a person is persecuted and killed, he is honored as a martyr, whose sacrifice for humanity is publicly recognized and revered. Killing is thus not enough, rather it causes other repercussions (such as backlash and revolt by the suppressed community) against the inhuman interests of the ones who want to persecute. Therefore, the character of the person has to be murdered first to deprive him from any sympathy or empathy from the masses and to incite extreme hatred and mob anger. After a person's character has been poisonously defamed and completely assassinated - he cannot live what he wants to live, he cannot preach what he wants to preach, .

Forever he is imprisoned in the hate prison. He cannot have decent survival. His dignity and integrity, his human rights are destroyed once and for all. They are replaced with defense and explanatory attitude to justify his very existence in the human family rather than peaceful existence. The 'target' is forced to lose his credibility among masses. He is destroyed morally, socially, economically, psychologically and left to die in isolation silently and the world remains oblivious to this persecution.. The damage done to him will last for lifetime and even after it. It is a plan to eliminate him from human history.

Following is a brief historical account when “brutal assassination became a failed strategy” during the religious persecution of Guru Tegh Bahadur, the ninth Sikh Guru, a spiritual leader of a minority religious sub-sect from North India.