What does the FSL report really say🔗

Below are the digitized scans of the FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report as it is:

FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report, Page 2

(231) Form No. FSL/DELHI/FM/03/23/24.12.2007 (Page 02 of 03)

seen adjusting the 'spy camera' and was found in intimate position with the male person and seen involved in other activities with the male person in the video recordings was marked as "Exhibit-QFFI".

Exhibit-2: One memory card 'SDHC 8 GB' of "San Disk" make, with serial No."B10922413493G" made in China. The facial image of the male person in the video recording was marked as "Exhibit-QMFI" and the facial image of female person who was seen installation of 'spy camera' and other activities in the video recordings was marked as "Exhibit-QFFI".

Parcel-2: One envelope, sealed with cellophane tape stated to be containing DVD; on opening, one DVD was found and it was marked as "Exhibit-3" in the laboratory.

Exhibit-3: One DVD-R of "Moserbaer" make, containing two folders, namely, "Photos" & Video". The folder, namely, "Photos" containing eight still images, namely, "DSC00056.JPG", "DSC00057.JPG", "DSC00058.JPG", "DSC00059.JPG", "DSC00060.JPG", "DSC00061.JPG", "DSC00062.JPG" & "DSC00064.JPG" and the folder, namely, "Video" containing one video file, namely, "Video.MTS". The specimen sample of facial image of female person in the video recording and still photographs (Digital) was marked as "Exhibit-SFFI".

Parcel-3: One envelope, sealed with cellotape stated to be containing DVD; on opening, one DVD-R was found and it was marked as "Exhibit-4" in the laboratory.

Exhibit-4: One DVD-R of "Moserbaer" make, containing one video file, namely, "Video.MTS" alongwith the still photographs. The specimen sample of facial image of male person in the video recording and still photographs (Digital) was marked as "Exhibit-SMFI".

Parcel-4: One sealed cloth parcel, sealed with the seal of "Y-I" at thirteen places stated to be containing a silent air purifier with an inbuilt Sony Spy Camera with two electronic chips, one adapter and a connecting cable; on opening, one spy camera kept in a body of air purifier, one adaptor and connecting cable were found.

Exhibit-5: One spy camera "Sony" make, kept in a case of air purifier with one adaptor and connecting cable.

3. RESULTS OF EXAMINATION/OPINION:

Form No. FSL/DELHI/FM/03/23/24.12.2007 (Page 03 of 03)

REPORT No. FSL 2010/P-3243/PHY-152/10 Dated _________

4. On image analysis and comparison of verbal portrait features, geometric and facial image superimposition of the image of the male person marked "Exhibit- QMFI" from the relevant video frames and the image of the person marked "Exhibit-SMFI" from relevant video frames and still images in Exhibit-4, the image of the person marked "Exhibit- QMFI" has resemblance to the image of the person marked "Exhibit-SMFI" in respect of their facial landmarks. Hence, the images of the person marked "Exhibit-QMFI" & "Exhibit-SMFI" are of the same person.

5. On image analysis and comparison of verbal portrait features, geometric and facial image superimposition of the image of the female person marked "Exhibit- QFFI" from the relevant video frames and the image of the person marked "Exhibit-SFFI" from relevant video frames and still images in Exhibit-3, the image of the person marked "Exhibit-QFFI" has resemblance to the image of the person marked "Exhibit-SFFI" in respect of their facial landmarks. Hence, the images of the person marked "Exhibit-QFFI" & "Exhibit-SFFI" are of the same person.

NOTE: Case exhibits sent to this division for examination have been sealed with the seal of "Dr.C.P. SINGH- FSL-DELHI".

Examined by

(Dr. C.P. SINGH)

Note: This Report is Per se admissible U/S.293 Cr.P.C. However, the scientific expert (witness) shall be available for cross examination, if required.

FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report, Page 4

Form No. FSL/DELHI/FM/03/24/24.12.2007

Forwarding Letter (Physics Division)

No.FSL- 2010/P-2031/Phy-93/10/3664 Dated : 3/6/10

To,

Subject: Examination of case property in FIR No 141/10 Dated 18/3/10 U/S 120B, 276, 377, 420 P.S Bidai, Ramanagar, Karnataka

MEMO

Please find enclosed herewith Report No. FSL-2010/P-2031/Phy-93/10 Dated 2/6/10 in respect of case property received with your Memo no. CRM.11/SE/CID/2010 Dated 11/05/10

All the concerned case property / exhibits are enclosed as per the details mentioned in the report.

DIRECTOR.

FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) report, Page 5

Form No. FSL/DELHI/FM/03/23/24.12.2007 (Page 01 of 02)

Forensic Science Laboratory

Govt. of NCT of Delhi Sector 14, Rohini, Delhi-110085. Tel: 011-27555811, Fax: 011-27555890

T-1705 Accredited by the National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories (NABL)

Examination Report REPORT No. FSL 2010/P-2031/PHY-93/10 Dated 02/6/10

To

Your letter No.CRM.11/SE/CID/2010/Bangalore Dated 12.05.10 regarding two parcels in connection with case FIR No.141/10 Dated 18.03.10 U/S 495(A), 376, 377, 420, 506(i) & 120B IPC P.S. Bidadi, Ramanagar, Karnataka duly received in this office on 13.05.10 through Insp. K. Nagaraja, CID Bangalore.

1. DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL (S) /EXHIBIT (S)

Sealed cloth parcels : 02 (Two)

Total : 02 (Two)

Two sealed parcels; seals were intact and tallied with the specimen seals as per forwarding letter (FSL FORM).

2. DESCRIPTION OF ARTICLES CONTAINED IN THE PARCEL (S)/EXHIBIT (S)

Parcel-1: One sealed cloth parcel found marked “Article8”, sealed with the seals of “TSR” at eight places, stated to be containing, two memory cards; on opening, two memory cards were found and they were marked as “Exhibit-1A” & “Exhibit-1B” in the laboratory.

Exhibit-1A: One memory card of “Sandisk” make, bearing serial number B10922313493G (Made in China) containing video recordings.

Exhibit-1B: One memory card of “Sandisk” make, bearing serial number B10922413493G (Made in China) containing video recordings.

Form No. FSL/DELHI/FM/03/23/24.12.2007 (Page 02 of 02)

Parcel-2: One sealed cloth parcel, sealed with the seals of "TSR" at eight places, stated to be containing, one DVD; on opening, one DVD was found and it was marked as "Exhibit-2" in the laboratory.

Exhibit-2: One DVD of "Moserbaer" make, containing video recordings.

3. RESULTS OF EXAMINATION/OPINION: The memory card marked "Exhibit-1A" contains 70 video clips and the memory card marked "Exhibit-1B" contains 213 video clips. On examination using ENCASE tool, it was found that there were 24 deleted files in the memory card marked "Exhibit-1A" and same have been retrieved from memory card marked "Exhibit-1A" and there were 34 deleted files in the memory card marked "Exhibit-1B"and same have been retrieved from memory card marked "Exhibit-1B" and DVD marked "Exhibit-2" contains 116 video clips. The video clips in DVD marked "Exhibit-2" are also in the memory cards marked "Exhibit-1A" & "Exhibit-1B".

On examination of video recordings in memory cards marked as "Exhibit-1A" & "Exhibit-1B" the followings were observed:

1. The video recordings in memory cards marked "Exhibit-1A" & "Exhibit-1B" contains in camera video shots in separate video clips. The video clips in memory cards marked "Exhibit-1A" & "Exhibit-1B" contains 70 & 213 identified video shots respectively.

2. The video recordings in memory cards marked "Exhibit-1A" & "Exhibit-1B" are in digital video format and there are no indication of alteration in the identified video shots on the basis of examination using Non-Linear Video Editing & Storage System & Video Analyst System.

3. The retrieved video recordings of the deleted files from the memory cards along with the video recordings in the memory cards marked "Exhibit-1A" & "Exhibit-1B" are provided in DVD marked "Copy of Exhibit-1A & Exhibit-1B".

NOTE: Case exhibits sent to this laboratory for examination have been sealed with the seal of 'Dr.C.P. SINGH- FSL-DELHI'.

Examined by

3. RESULTS OF EXAMINATION/OPINION:

1. On examination of 'spy camera' marked "Exhibit-5" which is built inside in a air purifier case; it was found in working condition.

2. The video recording in the memory chips marked "Exhibit-1" & "Exhibit-2" can be recorded by the 'spy camera', marked "Exhibit-5"

3. On examination of memory slots of 'spy camera' it was found that the original memory cards marked "Exhibit-1" & "Exhibit-2" can be inserted in the memory slot of 'spy camera' marked Exhibit-5 and video recordings can be done in these memory cards in the same format.

4. On image analysis and comparison of verbal portrait features, geometric and facial image superimposition of the image of the male person marked “Exhibit-QMFP” from the relevant video frames and the image of the person marked “Exhibit-SMFI” from relevant video frames and still images in Exhibit-4, the image of the person marked “Exhibit-QMFI” has resemblance to the image of the person marked “Exhibit-SMFF” in respect of their facial landmarks. Hence, the images of the person marked “Exhibit-QMFI” &. “Exhibit-SMFI” are of the same person.

5. On image analysis and comparison of verbal portrait features, geometric and facial image superimposition of the image of the female person marked “Exhibit-QFFI’ from the relevant video frames and the image of the person marked “Exhibit-SFFI” from relevant video frames and still images in Exhibit-3, the image of the person marked “Exhibit-QFFF” has resemblance to the image of the person marked “Exhibit-SFFP” in respect of their facial landmarks. Hence, the images of the person marked “Exhibit-QFFI” & “Exhibit-SFFI” are of the same person.

NOTE: Case exhibits sent to this division for examination have been sealed with the seal of ‘Dr.C.P. SINGH- FSL-DELHI’. Examined by (Dr. C.P. SINGH) Note: This Report is Per se admissible U/S.293 Cr.P.C. However, the scientific expert (witness) shall be available for cross examination, if required. FORENSIC SCIENCE LABORATORY GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI SECTOR-14, ROHINI, DELHI – 110085 Forwarding Letter (Physics Division) No.FSL- 2010/P-2031/Phy-93|10/3664 Dated : 3/6/10 To, K.S.P. Charan Reddy Dy. Inspector General of Police, CID – Bangalore Subject: Examination of case property in FIR No 141|10 Dated 18/3/10 U/S P.S. Bidadi, Ramanagar, Karnataka MEMO Please find enclosed herewith Report No. FSL- 2010/P-2031/Phy-93/10 Dated 2/8/10 In respect of case property received with your Memo no. CRM 11|SE|CID|2010 Dated 11/05/10 All the concerned case property / exhibits are enclosed as per the details mentioned in the report. DIRECTOR. Encls : (1) Sealed Report

(2) ________ sealed parcels (3) Sample seal impression Forensic Science Laboratory Govt. of NCT of Delhi Sector 14, Rohini, Delhi-110085. Tel: 011-27555811, Fax: 011-27555890 Accredited by the National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories (NABL) Examination Report REPORT No. FSL 2010/P-2031/PHY-93/10 Dated 02/6/10

1. DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL (S) /EXHIBIT (S) Sealed cloth parcels : 02 (Two) Total : 02 (Two) Two sealed parcels; seals were intact and tallied with the specimen seals as per forwarding letter (FSL FORM).

1. DESCRIPTION OF ARTICLES CONTAINED IN THE PARCEL (S)/EXHIBIT (S) Parc el 1: One sealed cloth parcel found marked “Article 8”, sealed with the seals of “TSR” at eight places, stated to be containing, two memory cards; on opening, two memory cards were found and they were marked as “Exhibit-1 A” & “Exhibit-1B” in the laboratory. Exhib it-1 A: One memory card of “Sandisk” make, bearing serial number B10922313493G (Made in China) containing video recordings. Exhib it-1 B: One memory card of “Sandisk” make, bearing serial number B10922413493G Made in China) containing video recordings.

3. RESULTS OF EXAMINATION/OPINION: The memory card marked "Exhibit-1 A" contains 70 video clips and the memory card marked "Exhibit-1B" contains 213 video clips. On examination using ENCASE tool, it was found that there were 24 deleted files in the memory card marked "Exhibit-1 A" and same have been retrieved from memory card marked "Exhibit-1 A" and there were 34 deleted files in the memory card marked "Exhibit-1B" and same have been retrieved from memory card marked "Exhibit-1B" and DVD marked "Exhibit-2" contains 116 video clips. The video clips in DVD marked "Exhibit- 2" are also in the memory cards marked "Exhibit-1 A" & "Exhibit-1B".

On examination of video recordings in memory cards marked as "Exhibit-1A" & "Exhibit-1B", the followings were observed:

NOTE: Case exhibits sent to this laboratory for examination have been sealed with the seal of 'Dr.C.P. SINGH- FSL-DELHI'.

Examined by (Dr. C.P. SINGH) Dr. C. P. SINGH Asstt. Director (Physics) Forensic Science Laboratory

Now let us see what exactly does the report provides as a "Result" or "Opinion" Statistically put, the whole report is somewhere around 1500 words. Only one-third of it (500 words), is the actual "Result" or "Opinion."

| FSL Report (all pages combined) | Words | %

| :--- | :--- | :--- |

| Total | 1548 | 100% | Signature, Stamps, Address, Report number etc | 423 | 27% | Description of Parcel and Packing | 71 | 5% | Description of articles contained in the parcel | 539 | 35% | Results of Examination and Opinion | 515 | 33%

Out of those 515 words from Results of Examination and Opinion, only 141 words are the main report. The remaining 374 words are again a description of parcel and software used. These 141 words make only 2 points in total. The US forensic reports gave 60 points to explain how the video is fabricated, which means it is 30 times more detailed on a fact-to-fact basis.

These are two major points that the "huge" 1548 word report makes:

3. On image analysis and comparison of verbal portrait features, geometric and facial image superimposition of the image of the male person marked "Exhibit- QMFP" from the relevant video frames and the image of the person marked "Exhibit-SMFI" from relevant video frames and still images in Exhibit-4, the image of the person marked "Exhibit- QMFI" has resemblance to the image of the person marked "Exhibit-SMFF" in respect of their facial landmarks. Hence, the images of the person marked "Exhibit-QMFI" & "Exhibit-SMFI" are of the same person.

4. On image analysis and comparison of verbal portrait features, geometric and facial image superimposition of the image of the female person marked "Exhibit- QFFI' from the relevant video frames and the image of the person marked "Exhibit-SFFI" from relevant video frames and still images in Exhibit-3, the image of the person marked "Exhibit-QFFF" has resemblance to the image of the person marked "Exhibit-SFFP" in respect of their facial landmarks. Hence, the images of the person marked "Exhibit-QFFI" & "Exhibit-SFFI" are of the same person.

What does this mean? It is basically saying the person in the video is looking similar ("has a resemblance"), therefore the two people are the same.

Even a cat looks like a lion. Does it mean, you will conclude that the cat is actually "the lion"?

There is mention of the words "Verbal Portrait":

3. On image analysis and comparison of verbal portrait features, geometric and facial image superimposition of the image of the male person marked "Exhibit- QMFP" from the relevant video frames and the image of the person marked "Exhibit-SMFI" from relevant video frames and still images in Exhibit-4, the image of the person marked "Exhibit- QMFI" has resemblance to the image of the person marked "Exhibit-SMFF" in respect of their facial landmarks. Hence, the images of the person marked "Exhibit-QMFI" &. "Exhibit-SMFI" are of the same person.

Verbal Portrait is an obsolete Victorian era criminal identification methods. It was used in 1880's. It did not stand the test of time and was discredited late last century due to its unreliability.

Why should we rely on such old and obsolete techniques?

That is all there is to the FSL report which the media has reported as "proves that Paramahamsa Nithyananda is guilty" etc.

A Verbal Portrait: Victorian Criminal Identification Methods: Before the contemporary methods of forensic identification of criminals was developed, such as COMFIT or even the fingerprints databases, nineteenth century police forces around the world relied on a range of methods for identification. One of them was anthropometry, which evolved from the pseudoscience of phrenology which relied on series of cranial measurements to divine individual's characteristics including proclivity towards criminality.

Read more about it here: https://policingcolonialbrisbane.com/blog/2017/3/21/a-verbal-portrait-victorian-criminal-identification-methods

Sun TV COO (Chief Operating Officer) confessed on television, and in a sworn written affidavit that video is fake.

The ex-COO of Sun Television, Hansraj Saxena, confessed in several interviews to the media and in written affidavit to the Courts, that Sun Television aired the video continuously for 3 days on its channel, and the video was created by it for extortion purposes. Saxena was COO of Sun Television from the time of inception of Sun Television.

Hansraj Saxena appeared in at least six television channels with this confession and also gave a sworn affidavit to the Court detailing the usual modus operandi of Sun Television and its extortion rackets and how the false video against Paramahamsa Nithyananda was also an attempt to blackmail and extort huge money just like they had fabricated false videos similarly several times before.

Case 5:13-cv-00393-VAP-SP Document 156-3 Filed 11/03/14 Page 2 of 3 Page ID #:2603

DECLARATION OF DHARMARAJA HANSRAJ SAXENA

I, Dharmaraja Hansraj Saxena, declare and state as follows:

1. I have personal knowledge of all of the facts contained in this declaration and, if called as a witness, I could and would competently testify to all of said facts.

2. I deny any wrongdoing in this case.

3. I was a corporate officer of Sun TV Network Limited (“Sun TV”) from 2009 to 2011. I was the Chief Operating Officer of Sun Pictures, a division of Sun TV. I was an employee of Sun TV from 1994.

4. As a corporate officer of Sun TV Network Limited, I had high-level discussions with the other corporate officers of Sun TV and the members of the Board of Directors of Sun TV. I was highly familiar with the operations of Sun TV in general, not just the film division, which I headed.

5. In March of 2010, V. Raja was the head content editor of Sun TV’s news programming. S. Kannan was the Chief Technical Officer. R.M.R. Ramesh was the head of Kal Publications, which was effectively part of Sun TV and effectively owned by Sun TV.

6. As of March 2010, I had personal knowledge from my working at Sun TV that V. Raja, S. Kannan, and R.M.R. Ramesh had a routine practice of using the broadcasting of false news stories and true stories that have fabrications added to extort money from individuals and organizations. This happened at least seven times, likely more. These three individuals would use associates to have much of the direct contact with the victims.

7. Prior to March of 2010, I shared information with Kalanithi Maran that there are specific complaints about these people V. Raja, S. Kannan, and R.M.R. Ramesh on extortion activity. And Kalanithi Maran also indicated to me that he heard and received complaints on specific incidents and he condoned it.

8. A board meeting which comprised of Kalanithi Maran , S.Kannan ,

SAXENA DECLARATION

18 December 2011 - Dinamalar newspaper (Tamil): Saxena confession - SunTV making a business in extortion and blackmail, His Divine Holiness one amongst many other victims.

Nithyananda Ranjitha Video Fabricated - Saxena confession

Sun TV Conspiracy Exposed -- "Nithyananda-Ranjitha Video is Morphed" confesses Sun TV CEO Saxena

In a dramatic development, Sun TV CEO Saxena as well as Ayyappan, exposed the whole truth behind the alleged Nithyananda video scandal.

Saxena has categorically stated that the Nithyananda video is a clear instance of this extortion. He explained that industrialists and other high profile people are threatened and money extorted and Sun TV continues to do these illegal acts. He exposed news editor Raja and his team created the alleged Nithyananda scandal video to try extorting money from Nithyananda. The editor and his team have a network of people, who for example take a video of a factory and start rumors that sewage water is coming out of it and extort the factory owners with this false news.

Saxena in a public statement has stated that he is lodging a complaint with the Chennai Police Commissioner of the Tamil Nadu police saying that he has received death threats from Sun TV chief Kalanidhi Maran threatening that hired goons would come and kill them in 3 days. Saxena said that when he was in jail, the people of Kalanidhi Maran threatened his wife and extorted Rs. 12 crores, and that he has video and audio evidence of the same.

[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8fwXZgAY2jg]

The Actress has Categorically Stated that She is not the Person in the Video

Actress Ranjitha has categorically stated that she is not the person in the video, she has no complaints against Paramahamsa Nithyananda; instead He is like her God. When she has not lodged any complaint, where is the question of any legal implications.

DECCAN HERALD Sunday 21 February 2016 News updated at 1:15 PM IST Google Custom Search Home | News | New Delhi | Business | Supplements | Sports | Entertainm ks ED probe over watch Govt begins reservation of projects for SC/ST contractors You are here: Home » State » CD featuring Nithyananda and me morphed: Ranjitha CD featuring Nithyananda and me morphed: Ranjitha Bangalore, Dec 30, DHNS: Last updated: 30 December, 2010 Tamil actress Ranjitha, who in March this year was shown to be in a sex romp with Nithyananda, on Thursday described in a complaint before a Ramanagara magistrate that the video featuring her and the godman was "morphed".

According to the complaint against Lenin Karuppan, whose secretly videographed romp between Nithyananda and Ranjitha was televised by news channels on March 2 this year, the "morphed video" was used to "blackmail and extort money" from her.

In this context, the complaint — a copy of which is with Deccan Herald — says that in "furtherance of a conspiracy" Lenin "created a video with a man resembling Shree Nithyananda Swami and a woman having intimate relationship with him".

The Deccan Herald - 30 December 2010 Ranjitha declares video is false

The false video is not part of any legal proceedings against Paramahamsa Nithyananda. The fabricated video has too many legal implications against many news channels and conspirators and there are several cases being lost by media and media has had to apologize for this.

These are the channels who featured false abusive news:

No matter how many lies the media spread, the Truth will be out. And more lies they spread, the more in trouble they will get into, in explaining why they broke so many laws.