Video Expert Analysis Reports from USA
This text was machine-transcribed from the printed book and may contain errors. Select the words and choose “Report a mistake”.
U.S. Forensic Expert Reports state Video was Morphed: 60 technical points proven March 6, 2012: According to Four highly credible forensic video experts from USA, whose opinions are highly valued, the video is false and there is no possibility of it being true.
Following are some of the conclusions from the Expert Video Analysis Reports, after thorough analysis of the video on all technical grounds:
1. Edward Joe, 27+ years experience in audio and video forensic analysis court expert in USA, Registered Investigator (RI), Primeau Productions Inc. 1. Video is not authentic and real. It is altered. 2. Grossly edited and altered series of defamatory videos. 3. No audio so that the video cannot be authenticated by forensic voice identification to help identifying the persons in the video. 4. Video images layered on top of each other. 5. Video composite layering 6. Unusual aspect ratio – 704 x 496 is further proof of alteration 7. Ends abruptly and appears to be cut off proving it was edited or tampered.
2. David Notowitz, Forensic Video Expert in USA , Los Angeles Superior Court Expert Witness, National Center for Audio and Video Forensics
1. Chain of Evidence 1. “Video was allegedly taken December 23-25, 2009 and it emerged to the public March 2, 2010. What happened to the video during that time? We don’t know. The chain in this case was broken — not only little but extremely — because we don't have a trustworthy guardian of the video for over two months. During that time all kinds of digital manipulation may have been applied.”
- No audio - All devices have the function of recording audio too. Why not this device?”
- Unexplained start and stop
3. Bryan Neumeister, Certified Federal, US District, State, Department of Justice, Civil & Aviation Forensic Expert, 31 Years Professional Experience, USA Forensic Audio & Video Labs.
Video is fake - “There are questions as to whether the video could have been faked. The simple answer is. Yes, quite simply. With today’s rotoscoping faces on stunt person in the motion picture industry commonplace, the technology is available for anyone with a little knowledge and a mid-range home computer to be able to render scenes like these.”