University of Michigan Hospitals and Health Centers🔗

Health Maintenance Examination

History of Present Illness: Routine health maintenance exam. No concerns; chronic conditions stable except as noted below. The patient has had swelling and a lump on her left eyelid for 1 week.

Past Medical, Family, and Social History: Past medical history, family history, and genogram updated on green sheet. The patient's past medical history, medications, and allergies are updated on problem summary list.

Family history is significant for diabetes and heart attack in grandfather at age 70.

SEXUAL HISTORY: The patient's last menstrual cycle was 06/03/2010. Menarche age 15. The patient's cycles occur every 30 days and are 3 days in duration. She is a G1, P0 with no plans for pregnancy. She has a history of herpes simplex virus and uses condoms for contraception. She does have some concerns about her sexual functioning and is in a sexual relationship. She does wish to continue condoms for contraception. The patient is concerned she had exposure to a new partner 1 year ago and reports using condoms for contraception. She wonders if through oral sex or that episodes of vaginal intercourse she was exposed to sexually transmitted disease. Neither patient nor her husband have any genital discharge or symptoms.

SOCIAL HISTORY: The patient is a homemaker. She exercises 2 to 3 times per week. No alcohol, no tobacco. No street drugs. The patient lives with her husband. No specific stressors at this time.

REVIEW OF SYSTEMS: The patient has a lump on her left upper eyelid for the last 1 week. Please see addendum below.

PHYSICAL EXAMINATION: General: Blood pressure 92/64, weight is 124.9 pounds, height is 63.8 inches, body mass index of 20, pulse was 64. The patient in no distress. Eyes: Conjunctivae, lids, and irides appeared normal; pupils were equal. ENT: External ears and nose were normal. Mucous membranes were moist. Mouth and throat were normal. Neck: Symmetric and supple, without masses or thyromegaly. Lungs: Clear, with normal effort. Heart: Regular rate and rhythm, without murmur. Breast Exam: Symmetric breasts with dense breast tissue throughout. There is no mass, nipple discharge, nor axillary adenopathy. Genital exam shows normal-appearing labia majora, minora, clitoris, and urethra. Normal perineum and anus. Vaginal mucosa is well-estrogenized. Cervix is normal in appearance, but difficult to fully see secondary to blood consistent with menses in the vaginal vault. Pap smear was obtained. GC, chlamydia cultures obtained. Cervix did not appear to have any mucopurulent discharge. Bimanual exam shows no cervical motion tenderness. No tenderness or masses with palpation in the suprapubic and adnexal area.

Date Printed: 08/22/2012 - 02:20:13 PM Page 10 of 38

Reg#: 30713680 Name: RAO, AARTHI DOB: 12/23/1971 Sex: F Age: 38 Years

Uterine size difficult to evaluate secondary to retroversion. Pulses were normal, and there was no extremity edema. Abdomen: Soft, nontender, nondistended, and bowel sounds normal. No masses or organomegaly. Lymphatic: No cervical or inguinal lymphadenopathy. Musculoskeletal: Gait and posture were normal. There was no clubbing or cyanosis. Skin: Normal turgor and appearance. Psychiatric: Alert and oriented, with normal mood and affect.

LABORATORY DATA: Reviewed labs through 2009.

MEDICAL DECISION MAKING:

PLAN: Discussed diet, exercise, and healthy lifestyle.

ADDENDUM: The patient 1 week ago had new onset of a lump on the lateral upper left eyelid. The area was approximately the size of a large pea, red, and painful. The area is no longer painful or red, and has decreased in size. The patient wonders if she needs to be seen by an ophthalmologist. The patient has no eye pain, and had no change in her vision.

Eye exam: a long 1 centimeter proximal to the lid margin on the left superolateral lid, there is a nontender subdermal nodule approximately 9 millimeters x 3 millimeters in size. When the patient everts the eyelid, I see no sign of purulence or abnormality.

Medical Decision Making: Chalazion, left upper eyelid. Improving. If symptoms do not resolve in 3 weeks, she will call our office for a referral to Ophthalmology Clinic at the University of Michigan to be seen as available. Diagnosis would be Chalazion, onset 05/30/2010, which has not resolved.

Department Of Family Medicine Family Medicine at Dominos Farms

Christine W. Krause, MD Clinical Instructor

//Electronically signed by Christine W. Krause, MD on 06/09/10 10:25:38 AM/ 06042010/C1B03_0737/06052010 06092010/4728/06092010

Date Printed: 08/22/2012 - 02:20:13 PM Page 11 of 38

Now, also remember (because this can get confusing) the fake rape accuser claims she was raped over 120 times by Paramahamsa Nithyananda from 2005 to 2009, and he had been her “partner” till 2009 - she claims she realized she was being ‘raped’ only in 2009 when she allegedly saw Paramahamsa Nithyananda with ‘another woman’ in the false video, so till then he was her ‘consensual partner’ apparently.

So Paramahamsa Nithyananda cannot be the “new partner” referenced in the medical report. And it can’t be her husband obviously as there is nothing “new partner” about it. If Paramahamsa Nithyananda is not her “new partner”, her husband is not a “new partner”, then who was the new partner? Whomever it is, this just shows the character and illicit and immoral lifestyle of Aarthi Rao who claims to be a “traditional Indian woman” as that is the only pivot for her allegations, the rest being factually disproved.

Now what kind of “traditional Indian woman” will go around sleeping with another man right after allegedly being raped? Analyze that.

The conclusion: The fake rape accuser was never raped by Paramahamsa Nithyananda. As her authenticated medical records show, she had extramarital affairs with at least one HIV positive man though, which is why she herself had to be tested for HIV—as per the medical reports.

(6). False rape accuser confessed in writing to Court after last alleged incident of rape she was not abused by Paramahamsa Nithyananda in any way.

The fake rape accuser had as late as July 30, 2009 (after the last instance of her alleged rape) sent a detailed email to Paramahamsa Nithyananda’s secretary about her conversation with her accomplice Vinay Bharadwaj, now a convicted child rapist sentenced to nearly 5 years in prison for multiple counts of serious child abuse in USA. The email is clinching evidence to prove the allegations of rape to be concocted as the fake rape accuser herself categorically admits that she was not sexually abused in any way by Paramahamsa Nithyananda and also she didn’t even know of anybody else who was subjected to any sort of sexual abuse by Paramahamsa Nithyananda. Interestingly, the email also has the false rape accuser expressing concern over the possibility of false cases being foisted on Paramahamsa Nithyananda and uncannily revealing the very modus operandi that would be used in the next couple of months to ignite a media firestorm and frame the false case around him.

False rape accuser’s email:

Question from the child rapist Vinay Bharadwaj to the Fake Rape Accuser: “Paramahamsa has had relationships with many women...Have you had any such experience?”

Direct Response from False Rape Accuser to Vinay Bharadwaj: “I have no direct knowledge of any of these things you are saying. In all my personal experiences, nothing like this has happened to me.” -Aarthi Rao

Further Statements in email by Fake Rape Accuser: ● “I feel there is a group of outcasts (disgruntled ex-disciples/devotees) who may feel weak as individuals to raise their voice/issues against Paramahamsa. But they must be trying to gather strength in numbers to attack Paramahamsa/mission in a bigger and legal way. ● We all know that one big lawsuit or bad publicity can completely damage Sri Nithyananda Paramahamsa’s image and the mission and setback all his efforts to a large extent.”

Premeshwari Mayi Nithyananda <[email protected]>