UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT🔗

[] Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

[] Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

[X] Decision by Court. This action was decided by the Court without a trial or hearing.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED That pursuant to the August 12, 2014 Order, Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff, and against Defendant Rao, in the amount of Four Hundred Sixty-Three Thousand, Two Hundred Eleven and 25/100 Dollars (463,211.25), plus attorneys fees (10,568.30), plus costs ($603.20), plus post-judgment interest in the amount of 3% per annum.

Date: August 12, 2014 John Hehman, Clerk

12 August 2014: US Court - Half a million dollar fine for Aarthi Rao So a Court of similar jurisdiction in USA has already ruled that the case of the fake rape accuser is false. This itself shows the case in India has to be closed as false as well.

(15). Motivated complaint The false complaint of rape by the false rape accuser is not a genuine one but motivated. She is not the victim but actually the perpetrator of crimes. She is facing trial in the Court of Chennai along with all her accomplices – Lenin Karuppan, Sun TV officials, Tamil tabloid Nakkeeran editors.

Her passport has been confiscated by the Court so that she does not escape out of the country to her home country USA where she also faces arrest and prosecution.

Her accomplice Lenin (aka “new partner” referenced in her medical reports) was put in jail for 108 days, his anticipatory bail was cancelled as his role in the persecution was seen to be big.

(16). Alleged rape accuser goes on record to declare that she didn't file police complaint in US for sexual abuse The false rape accuser, sends and email communication to a detective in Ann Arbor Police Department, on Monday, October 08, 2010 00:33 where the detective was asking for some clarification regarding her complaint against His Divine Holiness Paramahamsa Nithyananda.

Facts I am aware of : ● I gave 2 complaints to Ann Arbor Police department, 1st complaint was in 2010, and 2nd complaint was in 2011. ● .... ● I did NOT file a complaint with Ann Arbor police for Sexual Abuse by Nithyananda Paramahamsa.

From: Aarthi Rao [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 00:33 To: Lencioni, Michael Subject: URGENT: Request clarification re. "Life Threat complaint" investigation

Dear Detective Lencioni,

Hope you are doing well. I have been in India for quite some time now, so I was unable to meet you in person in regards to the complaint of "Life Threat from Nithyananda Swami" which I filed last year. In response to my complaint you had sent me the email included below.

I believe Attorney David Draper has contacted you recently (Jun 18 - Jun 21) on behalf of Nithyananda Swami. Providing your email communication (please see attachment) with Mr. Draper as proof, Nithyananda has made the following grave misrepresentation in India to the media and public (through TV interviews, etc):

1. That I had filed a complaint with Ann Arbor Police for Sexual Abuse by Nithyananda Swami

2. That Ann Arbor police requested University of Michigan Health System to release my medical records to investigate my complaint (the complaint was in fact re. LIFE THREAT)

3. Nithyananda Swami has submitted to Ann Arbor Police his medical test report from India for sexually transmitted diseases.

4. That Ann Arbor police has investigated my complaint (of life threat from Nithyananda Swami), and closed my complaint based on the medical records of Nithyananda Swami and myself.

I request you to kindly clarify these misrepresentations at the earliest, as this is of great urgency and utmost importance to the criminal case against Nithyananda swami in India.

Facts I am aware of are:

8 October 2010 - Aarthi Rao says she did NOT file a complaint with Ann Arbor police for sexual abuse by Paramahamsa Nithyananda.

Then the question arises, why is she alleging rape, and what is she expecting from the police? Is this abuse of law enforcement bodies of the state?

(17). There is no evidence to support her claim of being separated from her family and brainwashing.

5. The medical records are inconsistent with her claims to have been emotionally devastated by the alleged experience with Paramahamsa Nithyananda or that she was separated or disconnected from her husband and family arising from the alleged brainwashing. The records indicate the contrary, with continued contact with her family and husband.

6. The timing of the alleged sexual activity is problematic. She claimed she both aborted a pregnancy and engaged in sex in January and February, 2005 after declaring herself as totally accepting Paramahamsa Nithyananda by December,

2004. During the month she spent in the aadheenam, she has been accompanied by her parents who appeared to have been present when she again alleged sexual contact. It is problematic to suggest that she would have been under the influence of Paramahamsa Nithyananda in such a short period of time, given the presence of her parents and her continuing connection to her Western lifestyle, since she travelled back and forth and does not appear to have spent any extended periods in the aadheenam and was never isolated from her family. This would not be consistent with her claims of being isolated and brainwashed.

(18). There is no evidence to support her claim of emotional injury from her involvement with Paramahamsa Nithyananda.

1. With reference to Bankruptcy Motion, Nov, 2011. She claimed to have been emotionally scarred by this abortion. This claim is inconsistent with medical records which fail to reference any adverse emotional effects arising from the abortion.

2. Medical records from 3 June 2010, confirmed she was living with her husband. It was noted she had a normal mood and emotional state. There was no reference to any emotional issues which she was claiming at this time arising from her allegations of having been sexually abused. The content of the medical records contrasts with the content of a TV news interview (9 June 2012), in which she claimed to have contemplated suicide when she discovered the content of the video and that her marriage was shattered as a result. She reiterated the destruction of her marriage in a NDTV interview on 29 September 2012. In this broadcast, she also denied having herpes (repeated in a News interview on 3rd and 5th October

2012) and claimed to have forgotten her parents and friends while involved with the aadheenam. Her statements to the media are inconsistent with the contemporaneous records which fail to show emotional distress, document a history of herpes and continuing contact with her husband and family.

2004. During the month she spent in the aadheenam, she has been accompanied by her parents who appeared to have been present when she again alleged sexual contact. It is problematic to suggest that she would have been under the influence of Paramahamsa Nithyananda in such a short period of time, given the presence of her parents and her continuing connection to her Western lifestyle, since she travelled back and forth and does not appear to have spent any extended periods in the aadheenam and was never isolated from her family. This would not be consistent with her claims of being isolated and brainwashed.

6. As per her medical records there is no departure from her reported normal mood prior to or following the alleged discovery of sexual abuse. This is inconsistent with her claims (on television and otherwise). The only departure from her normal mood reflected in the medical records would be the note of anxious emotions on 25 March 2009 which may have stemmed from the possible spread of her herpes to her face.

(19). There is no evidence to support her claim of sexual involvement with Paramahamsa Nithyananda

2012) and claimed to have forgotten her parents and friends while involved with the adheenam. Her statements to the media are inconsistent with the contemporaneous records which fail to show emotional distress, document a history of herpes and continuing contact with her husband and family.

9. The medical records of the alleged rape accuser indicate that she conveyed to her physicians that she has an extra-marital partner in 2009 and was concerned about having contracted a sexually transmitted disease. The timing of this extra-marital affair would not comport with her claim to have been sexually involved with Paramahamsa Nithyananda, since it is not clear why she would have revealed this at this time to her physician, had it been going on for four years by then, or why she would have been worried about a sexually transmitted disease if she were still under the assumption that Paramahamsa Nithyananda was not sexually active.