Hindu Holocaust

The 53 day illegal arrest ended with

This text was machine-transcribed from the printed book and may contain errors. Select the words and choose “Report a mistake”.

Bail conditions suspending Human Rights & Freedom of speech

4. During the course of investigation, the Police recorded the statements of the devotees, disciples and various other persons. For the purpose of investigation, several remand applications were filed before the learned Magistrate for the purpose of further investigation. Number of statements have been recorded, however, the statements of these witnesses do not reveal any offence alleged in the F.I.R. Most of the

More than 50 witnesses, devotees, disciples and various people were remanded, interrogated and harassed by prosecution but people only gave statements in support of His Divine Holiness and his divinity.

10. Looking at the entire material collected by the prosecution and the alleged video clippings telecast on the T.V., no doubt it touches the sentiments of the devotees and the followers. However, it may at the best attract the offence punishable under Section 295-A of IPC and the said offence is

The telecasted morphed video clips undoubtedly hurts devotees. The clips do not support fake rape (376) charges.

11. In these circumstances, the question arises as regard to the life and liberty of an accused. Under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, no person would be denied of right to life and personal liberty except in accordance with law. In order to detain or deny the right of liberty, there must be something against the accused to detain him. No doubt, serious offences are alleged against the accused No.1, but same is not supported by any material. Just based on the allegation, the liberty of person cannot be denied. Further, the Investigating Officer has filed a memo stating that there is no material against the accused and has also stated that, presence of the accused is not required for investigation.

There is no material to support any of the allegations of rape or any allegations. Just based on allegations a person cannot be denied right to life. Even the Investigation Officer said, “there is no material to support any allegations”.

Propaganda for Justification of Persecution:

Court is clear that the matter cannot be discussed as it has been distorted by the Media character assassination of the image of Swamiji.

However since,

His Divine Holiness is at a position of high respect and regard in the Hindu society there should not be even one iota of doubt on his image and His Divine Holiness must come out of the persecution demonstrating strong determination and courage living up to the expectation of the people.

Unjust Bail Conditions - Human Rights Suspended

Freedom of Speech, freedom to impart religious discourses indefinitely suspended. Freedom to travel suspended : Cannot leave the town without court permission. Has to give attendance in Police station every 15 days.

https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1nLmADk1xByHEQYDi6prgK1 RZKkF9pCPG

2010-07-16 Bail Conditions Relaxed Basic Human Rights of Freedom of Speech Restored


	4. In so far as preventing the petitioner from preaching, it would amount to preventing his freedom of speech. Such a condition, in my opinion, may not be justified for a longer time. Accordingly, condition No.4, preventing him from preaching and taking classes, is relaxed. Court observers that the ban from preaching and giving religious discourses cannot be justified any further as it is depriving His Divine Holiness from the basic human right of Freedom of Speech. Court relaxed the bail conditions and withdrew the ban. https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/182nBvH75Wl_14SmssBaHQ7LQAlwONX1-
2011-04-21	Freedom is not free Court approval required for pilgrimage Court relaxes bail conditions for a 3 months pilgrimage. Unlike ordinary people who can travel as per their will, His Holiness has to ask Court for permission even for pilgrimage and even for visiting his birth place for last rites of his pre-monastic grandmother. Freedom is not free.

4. In so far as preventing the petitioner from preaching, it would amount to preventing his freedom of speech. Such a condition, in my opinion, may not be justified for a longer time. Accordingly, condition No.4, preventing him from preaching and taking classes, is relaxed. Court observers that the ban from preaching and giving religious discourses cannot be justified any further as it is depriving His Divine Holiness from the basic human right of Freedom of Speech. Court relaxed the bail conditions and withdrew the ban. https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/182nBvH75Wl_14SmssBaHQ7LQAlwONX1-

2011-04-21

Freedom is not free Court approval required for pilgrimage Court relaxes bail conditions for a 3 months pilgrimage. Unlike ordinary people who can travel as per their will, His Holiness has to ask Court for permission even for pilgrimage and even for visiting his birth place for last rites of his pre-monastic grandmother. Freedom is not free.

2 THE DIST., AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA, HAS DISMISSED THE BAIL PITITION ON 6/5/2010 IN CRL.MISC.PETITION NO.247/10.

READ: HIGH COURT ORDER DATED: 11.06.2010.

2. MISC.CRL.2233/11 FOR FILED BY THE ADV., FOR THE PETR. PRAYING TO RELAX CONDITION NOS.2 AND 3 IMPOSED UPON HIM WHILE GRANTING THE RELIEF OF BAIL, FOR THE REASONS STATED THEREIN.

THIS CRL.PETITION COMING ON FOR "BEING SPOKEN TO" IN CRL.P.2328/10, THIS DAY, THE COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

O R D E R

Herd learned counsel for the petitioner and Addl. State Public Prosecutor for the respondent. In modification of the order dated 8.4.11 the present order is passed.

The Office by mistake had mentioned the case number Crl.P.No.2329/10 though the application was filed in Crl.P.2328/10 and in this context though the order came to passed on Misc.Crl.No.2233/2011, the State Public Prosecutor had no opportunity to put forth his objections. It is in these circumstances that the objections are considered and the counsel for the petitioner and the Addl.SPP are heard with regard to relaxation of conditions. Taking into consideration the grounds made out, permission is accorded to the petitioner to leave the jurisdiction for the purpose of visiting Manasa sarovar and other places and he shall return back by the end of July 2011. After return from Manasa sarovar by the end of July 2011, the petitioner shall mark his presence before the jurisdictional police once in a month as ordered earlier.

So far as production of publication "Standup for Dharma", and the appending materials referred to therein, 2

https\://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1Ps9R1HjI7LAclaNFCPGMXfBVGq46soFP

2011-07-18