Hindu Holocaust🔗

Current status of the Persecution Trial 5
Highlights of the Persecution Trial 6

Who are the Forces behind such crimes? 8
The Elite State-Police-Media-Mafia 8
Individual vested interests 8
The Perpetrators of crime desire to remain hidden 8
Do the perpetrators of crime always stay hidden? 8
The Illuminati revealed 8

How do they Justify Persecution? 9
In a globally 'civilized' democratic society, justification of persecution of
minorities require a complex machinery. 9

How it is done? 10
7 Step process of executing a persecution 10

Being brutal is a failing strategy, especially in the modern information age 11
In Modern day era, more than murder which causes repercussions, it is
character assassination, the murder of identity, which really kills the person 11
How Religious Persecution of Guru Tegh Bahadur destroyed the Mughal kingdom in
1600 AD 12
Victims of persecution Adi-Shaivites seek help from Guru Tegh Bahadur 12
Why Guru decided to Sacrifice himself 12
The Illegal Arrest 13
Mughal State gives 2 choices - Convert to our Mughal Religion or Die 13
Refusal results in disciple being cut into two slowly by a saw while alive 13
Second refusal results in disciple being boiled to death 13
Third refusal results in disciple being burnt alive 14
Unable to break the Guru, they cut His head off the body 15
Official Justification Propaganda - How they tried to cover up 16

Failure of Brutal Strategy - How persecution of Guru Tegh Bahadur worked against
the Mughal State 16

The purpose of Character Assassination is to make the person feel as if the
whole world hates him and he is unworthy of survival. 19

Even after the death of the persecutor, the Kashmiri propaganda remains
alive 21

A brief timeline of Adi-Saivism highlighting Kashmir and South India related
events and Persecution 22

Bhagavan Sri Ramana Maharshi - described His next two incarnation
successors 31

Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba coronates Paramahamsa Sri Nithyananda as
‘the Avatar’ 33

2. Primary school with highest ratio of under age children appearing for and
clearing high school graduation 41

On 30 August 2018, the trial Court noted that the next date of hearing would be 6
September 2018. It said that the arguments would be by both side lawyers, AND THE
ACCUSED (His Divine Holiness) NEED NOT BE PRESENT. It was clearly
acknowledged that His Divine Holiness, as a pontiff, was on a spiritual pilgrimage,
and he would appear anytime he was needed by the Court.

However, on 6 September 2018, the Court did a complete U-turn and noted that "the
pontiff being on a spiritual pilgrimage" was not a valid condition for being absent and
that he did not comply with his commitment to be present in the court during the 1st
week of September (which was never given or asked for). And a NON-BAILABLE
WARRANT was issued against His Divine Holiness with no warning whatsoever,
especially when the law clearly states that the presence of the accused is not
necessary when his lawyer is present and does not object to the progress of the trial.

This U-turn in the court forces one to conclude that "extra judiciary interruptions and
influences" are showing their teeth in the ongoing trial, rendering it an unfair trial.