From impotency to having 'consensual sex': Nithyananda
This text was machine-transcribed from the printed book and may contain errors. Select the words and choose “Report a mistake”.
changes tune in rape case
In 2010, when the complaint was filed against Nithyananda, he had claimed he was impotent.
Theja Ram | Saturday, March 17, 2018 - 16:14
On Friday, self-styled godman Nithyananda's counsel VC Nagesh told the Karnataka High Court that the rape case filed against him by a woman in 2010, was actually a case of consensual sex and not rape.
VC Nagesh told the court that the 'victim had consensual sex with Nithyananda'.
On Friday, self-styled godman Nithyananda's counsel VC Nagesh told the Karnataka High Court that the rape case filed against him by a woman in 2010, was actually a case of consensual sex and not rape.
VC Nagesh told the court that the 'victim had consensual sex with Nithyananda'.
The survivor, who was a former member of Nithyananda's cult, had accused him of raping her during her stay at his ashram in Karnataka's Bidadi.
The new twist was offered by the counsel as the court was hearing Nithyananda's petition challenging the Ramanagaram court's order to frame charges against him.
However, this defense by Nityananda is a clear departure from his earlier claim in court. In 2010, when the complaint was filed against Nithyananda, he had told the Criminal Investigation Department sleuths that he was impotent.
He managed to evade the investigators for two years and finally in 2012, the Supreme Court ordered a potency test to be conducted on Nithyananda.
The potency test was to be conducted on June 30, 2012 at Bengaluru's Victoria Hospital. However, Nithyananda had fled to Kailash. The potency test was only conducted only two years later. In November 2014 the CID finally submitted the results of the potency test to the Ramanagara sessions court where it was proved that Nithyananda's claims of impotency was false.
For someone who has changed his tune every step of the way, the self-styled godman's lawyer has now said that the survivor did have "consensual sex" with Nithyananda.
"This is a totally contradictory stand. Initially, he said he was impotent, then when the test proved he was not, he is now changing his stand. This obviously has to go to trial if the truth has to be determined," the survivor's counsel, Ashwin Vaish said.
Not only taking a contradictory stance, Nithyananda's counsel also attacked the survivor's character in the High Court by making allegations about the victims sexual history.
VC Nagesh said that the survivor "had a history of having multiple sexual partners and that she also suffers from a communicable sexually transmitted disease".
"The complainant is an NRI, she is well educated and had lived in Nithyananda's
17 March 2018; News Minute distorted the statement of the counsel of His Divine Holiness and misrepresented the facts.