Attack On Paramahamsa Nithyananda By Indian Media - Manipulated Reporting About Fabricated Video🔗

Indian Media reports falsely on the fabricated video FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) reports, continuing the defamation and attack on His Divine Holiness Paramahamsa Nithyananda and Sanatana Hindu Dharma (Hinduism)

22 Nov 2017 On 22nd November 2017, more than 20 national television channels re-telecast the fabricated video which was first telecast on 2nd March 2010 (seven years back). The video has been condemned by 4 international forensic agencies, courts of various countries, and Bangalore Civil Court, even passed an Order to Writ Petition 8619/2011 and Order to W.P. 7767/2010, making it illegal to broadcast or publish the fabricated video in anyway. Why then is the Indian media promoting false news risking contempt of court as order to W.P.8619/2011 & W.P. 7767/2010?

| 14 March 2012: Order to Writ Petition 8619/2011 - Ranjitha Menon |

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF MARCH, 2012

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.ABDUL NAZEER

WRIT PETITION NO. 8619/2011 (GM-RES)

BETWEEN:

(BY SRI. G.R. MOHAN, ADV.) ... PETITIONER

AND

4. NEWS BROADCASTING STANDARDS AUTHORITY, NEWS BROADCASTERS ASSOCIATION REG. OFF.: 101-103, PARAMOUNT TOWER, BY ITS MANAGER, C-17, COMMUNITY CENTER, JANAKPURI, NEW DELHI - 110 058 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER

BANGALORE - 560 025

17. THE MANAGER, NTV-TELUGU, 564 A/19, LII ROAD NO. 92, JUBILEE HILLS, HYDERABAD - 500 033, ANDHRA PRADESH

26. THE MANAGER, THE TIMES OF INDIA, #40/1, S.B TOWERS, M.G. ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001 M/S. POOVAYYA & CO., ADV. FOR R4 SRI. S.N. BHAT, ADV. FOR R6 M/S.UNIVERSAL LEGAL, ADV.FOR R16,R26,R28,R39 SRI. M. JAIPRAKASH REDDY, ADV. FOR R19 SRI. DIWAKARA & ASSTS., ADV. FOR R20 SRI. LAKSHMINARAYANA N. HEDGE, ADV. FOR R31 M/S. MUFTHI LAW CHAMBERS, ADV. FOR R34 R5,R7,R14,R17,R21,R24,R25,R27,R29,R30,R32,R33, R35, R38 SERVED NOTICE TO R9 TO R13, R15, R22, R23, R36 & R37 DISPENSED WITH NOTICE TO R18 HELD SUFFICIENT)

THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO (A) RESTRAIN ALL RESPONDENTS FROM TELECASTING THE SAID CLIPPINGS SO THAT, THERE WOULD PREVAIL PROTECTION OF PUBLIC MORALS AND FOR THE FURTHER PROTECTION OF FUNDAMENTAL AND STATUTORY RIGHT OF THE PETITIONERS WHICH SHALL NOT BE DEPRIVED OF HER DIGNITY, REPUTATION AND PRIVACY IN ANY MANNER. (B) TO NOT ONLY STOP THE RESPONDENTS FROM BLOCKING ALL THE CLIPPINGS WHICH PROVIDE FOR VIEWING OF THE SCANDALOUS VIDEO BUT ALSO STOP USING ALL/ANY IMAGES, STATEMENTS, REFERENCE, NEWS PAPER CLIPPINGS, ARTICLES AMONGST OTHERS WHERE THE SCANDAL CLIPPINGS OF THE ALLEGED IMAGE OF PETITIONER HAS BEEN USED, UTTERED AND/OR REFERRED.

FORMER COO OF SUNTV SAXENA CONFESSED

Top Forensic Experts conclude: Nithyananda & Ranjitha video FAKE

The video title Video2010.ASF is not genuine and authentic. It is not real and is altered. The other videos on the internet have obvious edits. As a forensic expert I can clearly see the scenes jump and new characters, graphics and music added to glorify events that are not real. Because this video is not a representation of the facts and events as they occurred and is not real, it should not be viewed as real. Furthermore, the video2010.ASF and others like it have composite layering which includes scenes that were recorded at different times and blended together to appear to be real. As a video forensic expert, I recommend that this video be excluded from any factual relevance.

I am willing to testify in the United States or India and answer any questions regarding this forensic investigation.

Please let me know how I may assist further with this matter.

Respectfully,

Edward J Primeau, RI

Let us first see what various news channels said:

A few million dollars (more than Rs. 8 crore INR) in fined to various courts of both India and the US was not enough, Television channels suddenly decided to engage spreading false news about Paramahamsa Nithyananda yet again.

Now, let us see what the media did not report:

1. The report was out on 12 November 2010 itself (not after seven years like they reported, to deliberately make it look like a newly created report).

Yes, you heard it right, the report was released 7 years ago - way back in 2010.

Click to read the news article which was released about this forensic report, from 2010. The report never said that the video is real. Further, media is claiming that the report came out only on 22 November 2017 - 7 years and 10 days later!

In 2010, it was decided by the State Police not to make the Indian forensic reports part of the illegal trial proceedings against His Divine Holiness Paramahamsa Nithyananda. The report is a crucial evidence which establishes the falsity of the entire matter and the illegal nature of the arrest and proceedings which happened against Paramahamsa Nithyananda.

An RTI application filed by a devotee of Paramahamsa Nithyananda revealed that no such report was ever published by CSFSL.

In an effort to expose the Conspired Media Trial, masterminded by extremist Hindu terrorist groups in a deeply corrupted nexus with the Presstitutes, an RTI (Right to Information Act) application was applied to the Directorate of Forensic Sciences – New Delhi on 23 November 2017 seeking information regarding the Analysis reports of the false Controversial Sex Scandal Video, portraying His Divine Holiness Paramahamsa Nithyananda and Actress Ranjitha in a compromising position.

23 November 2017 - RTI Application

Date: 23.11.2017 Place: Vridhachalam

National News Media and Regional News Media houses were broadcasting News on 22nd November 2017, about Hindu Guru, Paramahamsa Swami Nithyananda. A Video was released by a Tamil MediaHouse Sun-Network in 2010. The persons showed in the video in compromising position was claimed to be Swami Nithyananda and a Actress Ranjitha by the Media Houses. It was said that the Purported Video has been tested for veracity and authenticity at the Central Forensic Science Labs (CFSL).

The news says that the "Central Forensic Science Labs has confirmed that Swami Nithyananda and Actress Ranjitha were present in the Video". This news is spreading via all TV media, Websites, Social Media, Print Media etc. I need some information regarding this.

http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/swami-nithyananda-ranjitha-sex-tape-confirm/1/1095166.html

https://tamil.samayam.com/tamil-cinema/movie-news/actress-ranjitha-is-in-the-video-with-nithyananda-says-forensic-analysis-report/articleshow/61752964.cms

http://www.teluguboard.com/movie-news/3f9e4ff8ac/delhi-forensic-lab-confirmed-it-was-swami-nithyananda-with-actress-ranjitha

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HzwOfxvit4w

The questions asked via RTI were:

The Directorate of Forensic Sciences Lab – New Delhi had forwarded the above said RTI Application to the Central Public Information Officers (CPIO) of CFSL Labs of Chandigarh, Hyderabad, Kolkata, Guwahati, Bhopal, Pune and also CFSL CBI – New Delhi, to give the appropriate Information.

The Reply/Information from each CFSL Lab is given below:

CFSL CBI - New Delhi - The CPIO of CFSL CBI - New Delhi had asked for the FIR details if they had to provide any information. After the FIR details was provided the following reply was given by the CFSL CBI

Nowhere does the FSL report say that the video is real.

The report is written in a double-negative way.

Example of a double negative statement : "It doesn't look like that fruit is not an apple." This statement doesn't mean that the fruit we are talking about is an apple. The report does not state that the video is fabricated, therefore the media maliciously and incorrectly stated that the video is real.

Four US-based forensic agencies which are employed by FBI, gave 60 points to show that the video is fabricated.

The US forensic experts in total give 60 points. The FSL India report gives only 2 points of opinions. The US forensic experts reports are 30 times bigger on a fact-to-fact basis.