A Detailed Analysis Of The Conspiracy Against🔗

Paramahamsa Nithyananda

More than 15 (equally) key observations that INDEPENDENTLY lead to the conclusion of rape allegations being false

1. Paramahamsa Nithyananda is Medically Impotent

2. No Material Evidence

3. False rape accuser has 4 highly contagious, incurable STDs and Paramahamsa Nithyananda doesn’t have any STD

4. Statements of false rape accuser contradict factual evidences

5. Fake rape accuser had exposure to HIV positive “new partner” after the last incident of alleged rape

6. False rape accuser confessed in writing to Court, after the last alleged incident of rape, that she was not abused by Paramahamsa Nithyananda in any way

7. The ‘sex scandal’ video on which basis the case originated itself is fabricated

8. Fake rape accuser gives ‘witness statement’ in existing case instead of an original complaint

9. Uncondonable delay of more than one and half years to give statement after date of last alleged rape incident

10. Blood test of fake rape accuser is missing in medical test

11. Six clinching factual evidences to disprove allegations of false rape accuser

12. Educated, traditional Indian woman claiming to be brainwashed into having sex for enlightenment is untenable

13. Modification of statement to fill in gaps is illegal

14. USA Court dismissed the case as baseless and imposed fine of over half a million dollars for false case

15. Motivated complaint

16. False rape accuser goes on record to declare that she didn't file police complaint in US for sexual abuse

17. There is no evidence to support her claim of being separated from her family and brainwashing

18. There is no evidence to support her claim of emotional injury from her involvement with Paramahamsa Nithyananda

19. There is no evidence to support her claim of sexual involvement with Paramahamsa Nithyananda What is the conspiracy against Paramahamsa Nithyananda about?

Why was there a false rape charge against Paramahamsa Nithyananda?

Was He the target of a conspiracy, as other Hindu leaders have been?

We will let the facts speak for themselves and let you decide:

May 2009: child rapist Vinay Bharadwaj, NRI in Seattle, Washington, volunteer at one of the Nithyananda Vedic temples in Seattle, is suspected to have an inappropriate relationship with a young minor girl of around 12 years whose parents are devotees of Paramahamsa Nithyananda. He is expelled as a volunteer from Nithyananda Mission. As a result, he is seething with anger at being caught and also afraid of being imprisoned for his serious crimes of child rape. Vinay was desperate to somehow escape from his crimes. He needed to fabricate a defense. His ploy – blackmail the parents of the minor by threatening to put a false case against Paramahamsa Nithyananda.

August 10, 2009

Dear Vinay:

Thank you for taking time to meet with us yesterday. We are pleased that we were able to have an open and respectful conversation. This letter documents the essence of our discussion yesterday, and our agreement.

First, we were disappointed to learn that you had made very serious and untrue allegations about Nithyananda Mission, Life Bliss Foundation and Nithyananda Foundation (collectively, "the Mission") and our Leaders. We appreciate your truthfulness yesterday in acknowledging that those allegations were false. While we understand that you felt slighted and sidelined, that is no excuse for making the calls and false/disparaging comments that you made, especially given the role that you have played in the Mission.

We also discussed that you were removed from Seattle in large part due to your contact with a minor child. You agreed that, despite your earlier agreement not to be in contact with her, even recently from India, you continued to have contact with her, despite being forbidden from doing so. That has caused embarrassment to our Mission. You have agreed to have no further contact with the minor or her family. You told us that you understand the gravity of the no-contact obligation and commitment, and the importance of adhering to it.

As a consequence of your improper activities, it has been determined that you cannot represent the mission and do the teachings of the mission. Given the nature of your actions that may have already harmed Swami's and our community's reputation, it is not possible to consider having you in public representing the Foundation in the role of a trainee monk. However, as we discussed, we would be willing to welcome you as a devotee and work with you to make amends and support you as you try to rebuild mutual trust and grow within the Foundation again.

1. Agreement that Claims Were False

By signing this letter, you are acknowledging the falsity of slanderous, defamatory and false claims that you made against the Mission, and our Leaders. You also agree to never make such statements again. You agree that you will not disparage or criticize the Mission or its affiliates or subsidiaries, leaders, devotees, or volunteers, clients or services and will not otherwise do or say anything that could interfere in any way with any of their reputation at any time in the future.

2. Change of Status

Until it may later be changed by us in writing, this is our agreement. You will have no other responsibility for any leadership role in the Mission, and you have no authority to act in any capacity other than a devotee. You have been removed from your position as a trainee monk. You shall not hold yourself out to others as a monk of the Mission or 11. Except for the right of Foundation or Leader to seek equitable or injunctive relief, all disputes arising under this Agreement or relating to its provisions that cannot be informally resolved by the parties shall be submitted to binding arbitration in Seattle, Washington in accordance with the then applicable commercial rules of the Arbitration Association and judgment upon an award shall be entered in the Superior Court of the State of Washington.

12. If any party to this Agreement employs attorneys to enforce any rights arising out of or in relation to this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees. This Agreement shall be construed and controlled by the laws of the State of Washington, without regard to its choice of law provisions. If any provision of this Agreement shall be held by a court of competent jurisdiction or an arbitrator to be illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect.

13. All obligations created by this Agreement shall survive termination of any relationship as between the parties and remain in effect in perpetuity.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this letter and Agreement.

For the FOUNDATION

By Gopal Sheelum

(Date) 10th August, 2009

Witness 1

Name: RAJESH KRISHNAN

Signature:

Address: 8090 CORNWALL CT, #35 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91739

Date: AUGUST 10, 2009

VOLUNTEER

Vinay Bharadwaj

Witness 2

Name:

Signature:

Address:

Date:

July 2009: child rapist Vinay tried asking false rape accuser Aarthi Rao, another NRI and his close confidante, if she was abused in any way by Paramahamsa Nithyananda. Somehow, if he could get her to put a rape case against Paramahamsa Nithyananda, he could escape from his child rape...

A key fact about Aarthi Rao is she has the rare condition of having 4 STDs, highly contagious and incurable, which spread not just by sexual contact but by mere touch of fluid like saliva or fluid in the blisters. Why is this a key fact?

i) Aarthi Rao claims to be a traditional Indian woman who was brainwashed into having sex with Paramahamsa Nithyananda. But which ‘traditional Indian woman’ will have 4 STDs?

ii) Given the number of instances of sexual abuse and rape allegations by Aarthi Rao, Paramahamsa Nithyananda or anyone for that matter, would have contracted the diseases from her. What is the probability of contracting even 1 STD in life? It could happen through sexual contact with a partner carrying the STD, or it could happen for non-sexual reasons like through a blood transfusion gone wrong. What is the probability of contracting 2 STDs? Now that probability is exponentially lower than the probability of contracting 1 STD. If it happens, it is most likely possible through sexual contact with two different people having 1 of the STDs each. Now, what is the probability of contracting 4 STDs? Extremely low for any reason other than the person has had sexual relations with multiple people, some of whom he or she contracted at various times each of the STDs. Now what does that speak of the character of the person? Point is she is definitely not a “traditional Indian woman”. Having 4 STDs and not transmitting the same to the spouse is almost impossible, even though it is a crime as per US laws to not disclose about the existence of STD to one’s own spouse. This naturally resulted in marital discord, separation, illicit affairs, financial problems especially to upkeep a high class, sexually hyperactive lifestyle. With this derivation, it was easy to correlate what otherwise would have been shocking or doubtful information that we got from reliable sources: Aarthi Rao was having illicit sexual relationship with Lenin Karuppan, a volunteer of the Nithyananda Mission in India. And her medical records speak for themselves.

July 2009: Lenin Karuppan, a volunteer of Nithyananda Mission in India, is caught for financial fraud of over 1 crore rupees at Nithyananda Galleria, a company involved with making and sale of Vedic items. Lenin is debarred from handling finances. Right after, his misdemeanour with some women is brought to light. He is seething with revenge, looking for a way to get back at Paramahamsa Nithyananda for choking his illegal financial fraud.

Added to this mix of appalling characters are the land sharks and bigger players who had ideological problems with Paramahamsa Nithyananda. Paramahamsa Nithyananda was rising fast in popularity in the South Indian state of Tamil Nadu which was led by Atheists. By 2009, he was a young dynamic force of Hinduism, especially his grand padayatra (marathon peace walk) during January 2009 reviving the true spirit of Hinduism in the hearts of lakhs of people. By December 2009, Paramahamsa Nithyananda had completed two very successful North American tours and his international reach was rapidly growing. Land sharks eyeing donated land: People at large who benefited from Paramahamsa Nithyananda's teachings, services and life solutions expressed their gratitude in many ways including joining His mission, donations in kind, donating their properties to enable building temples, schools, aadheenams, etc., on the same. Prime property was donated to Paramahamsa Nithyananda in Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka which attracted powerful forces and land sharks that coveted these properties. This is evident from the fact that during the extortion and blackmail, two properties were demanded in addition to money. Paramahamsa Nithyananda's popularity as a Hindu guru also brought Him into the radar of some vested interest media like tabloid Nakkeeran, and television channels of Sun Network (Sun TV, etc) who project their ideology as atheism. Kalanidhi Maran, media baron and head of the atheist movement in Tamil Nadu saw Paramahamsa Nithyananda as a powerful force against his dwindling atheism movement that needed to be destroyed. Nakkeeran Gopal and Kamaraj, editors of Tamil tabloid Nakeeran and known to be directly in touch with international smuggler Veerappan, also thrived on the chaos created by atheism. The seeds of the conspiracy were laid...

December 2009: Paramahamsa Nithyananda is a public figure who is young and dynamic. Most of His life after His mission started is on videotape for archival purposes. Ranjitha is an actress, a public figure and there is enough video footage of hers available across the 80 films she did in various Indian languages. A video was fabricated showing the two in an intimate position.

The conspiracy plan was three-fold – use the video to threaten Paramahamsa Nithyananda, blackmail Him so that all the money and assets can be extorted. After bleeding Him and His organization, destroy Him by releasing the video, launch a media led character assassination that would destroy the sentiments of His followers and ultimately destroy His life as a spiritual guru once and for all. Riding on the wave of frenzy created by the video, slap a lawsuit on Him accusing him of some sexual charges, and seal his fate once and for all, especially given He would have been bled completely of finances and would not be able to defend himself. Nor could he even approach anybody for financial help because of the character assassination and resulting loss of trust. The conspirators assumed and banked on the assumption that no normal person would be able to survive this onslaught of criminal allegations and media uproar.

2nd. March 2010: The deadly conspiracy was unleashed. 100 crore rupees was the demand in the extortion. They had managed to extort 60 lakh rupees. For the relatively nascent phase of Paramahamsa Nithyananda's mission, that was a huge amount to be fleeced of. Now the next phase of the attack - release the fabricated video on the largest network of television channels - Sun Network, headed by Kalanidhi Maran the media baron. Being the head of one of the extremist Hindu militant terrorist groups in South India, it also served the lethal purpose of denigrating 'godmen' and branding them and religious followers as frauds and fools. The physical assets of Paramahamsa Nithyananda's mission like the properties of the centers and aadheenams were physically destroyed by a planned rampage by the henchmen of Sun TV who did not blink twice before burning down the aadheenam, with the aadheenam residents inside. Who cares if innocent civilians are hurt in the process? It makes for good TV - and ratings.

Other conspirators joined opportunistically in this large scale attack -

1) Manohar Shinde, a self-proclaimed Hindutva protagonist in USA who tried to take over the Los Angeles Nithyananda Vedic temple, a $5 Million dollar property, and was eyeing the Bidadi aadheenam, the spiritual headquarters of the Nithyananda Mission. He was openly instrumental in supporting the false case of rape against Paramahamsa Nithyananda by giving financial support to the fake rape accuser Aarthi Rao.